TestWiki:Request permissions

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

Example (Example Permission)

Example (talk) 00:00, 01 January 1970 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Example Permission
 * Reason for requesting: An example reason for the requested right
 * Reason for requesting: An example reason for the requested right
 * ✅. DoNotArchiveUntil (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2499 (UTC)

AnnAngela (Admin)
AnnAngela (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Admin
 * Reason for requesting: Test https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SecurePoll and find out how it work
 * Reason for requesting: Test https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SecurePoll and find out how it work
 * Oh, I realized that this wiki doesn't have SecurePoll, forget it and deny please. -AnnAngela (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, we don't have it. ❌. --Anton (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Fredster33 (Admin)
Fredster33 (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Admin
 * Reason for requesting: Testing blocks, CSS and JS
 * Reason for requesting: Testing blocks, CSS and JS
 * You cannot edit public JavaScript files using only Administrator, however, you can edit Special:MyPage/common.js to make JavaScript which will only affect you. Naleksuh (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅: I did this thoughtfully. But because the user says'll use also block feature, I ✅ the admin flag. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially Testing policy and Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Thank you. --Anton (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Olipino (Admin/Bureaucrats)
Olipino (talk) 06:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Admin/Bureaucrats
 * Reason for requesting: testing blocks, rights, deletions and protections
 * Reason for requesting: testing blocks, rights, deletions and protections


 * ✅. Administrator rights granted. You can only ask for the rights of a bureaucrat later. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially Testing policy and Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Anton (talk) 07:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅: per Bureaucrats (account must be at least 24 hours old and have at least 10 edits) when requested yesterday, this user has not been granted bureaucrat rights. Now this account is old enough and compliant. See also User talk:Olipino. --Anton (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Theory of Eternity (Admin)
Theory of Eternity (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Admin
 * Reason for requesting: cause I want to see what admins can do on the MediaWiki software
 * Reason for requesting: cause I want to see what admins can do on the MediaWiki software


 * ✅. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially Testing policy and Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Anton (talk) 11:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Theory of Eternity (Admin)
Theory of Eternity (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Admin
 * Reason for requesting: For testing admin powers like protecting and deleting page sand blocking users
 * Reason for requesting: For testing admin powers like protecting and deleting page sand blocking users
 * ❌ I'm not satisfied with your apparent confirmation edit on an account created just today and which has zero edits. Moreover, given the outstanding outstanding concerns related to abuse of multiple accounts on Test Wiki, restoration of rights will not be considered at this time. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Joritochip (Administrator)
Joritochip (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Administrator
 * Reason for requesting: I would like to test the Flow extension.
 * Reason for requesting: I would like to test the Flow extension.
 * ✅. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially Testing policy and Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Dmehus (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Olipino (Interface Administrator)
– Olipino (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Interface Administrator
 * Reason for requesting: I'll help to manage system messages.
 * Reason for requesting: I'll help to manage system messages.


 * I can’t grant these permissions because bureaucrats can’t grant this, but usually interface administrator permissions are not a test right. Dmehus, renovating, if I'm wrong (thanks)? Currently, this wiki has two interface admins: me and another. I think two is enough interface admin, because at the moment this wiki is also with the technical side all very well. This was not an official decision, but my opinion. Thank you. --Anton (talk) 14:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Olipino There is no specific number of interface administrators, so I would certainly consider granting this user group with a demonstrated need. However, you say your reason is to "help manage system messages." This doesn't need  permissions, as any   with the   user right is able to edit MediaWiki system messages in MediaWiki: namespace. Dmehus (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , please proceed to what you think should be done here. I would like to edit JavaScript or CSS interface files if there is the need. You may be informed that I requested an edit on a js file because I thought there was a need to edit but the conclusion was something different. – Olipino (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. This is a bit better, but can you elaborate on the type of editing you wish to make to existing gadgets, which gadget(s) you wish to focus on, or which gadget(s) you think could be useful for TestWiki? Dmehus (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , I need to be careful to edit those files because those affect all users rather than only one user (the performer). I will focus on discussion gadgets because they seem to be very useful while discussing something. I'd like to make a gadget similar w:User:Enterprisey/reply-link.js on enwiki. But for editing it, I will (probably) require  bit. – Olipino (talk)  15:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That one in particular was the predecessor to the DiscussionTools extension, so may not be needed here. Dmehus (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've ✅ the DiscussionTools extension on this page, per your request. Dmehus (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you for enabling it. What about giving the interface admin bit to my account? -- Jusl¡t (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That can be done when you elaborate more specifically on your need for the bit, as described here. Dmehus (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Joritochip (Bureaucrat)
Joritochip (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * User:
 * Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
 * Reason for requesting: Testing nuke extension (I will keep this testing limited to my userspace)
 * Reason for requesting: Testing nuke extension (I will keep this testing limited to my userspace)