User talk:Cocopuff2018

Test --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

test
test 1234

Another test
test page 1234 --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

unfair demotion
i told black widow to stop removing the conversation as it was legit unnecessary and he did not listen so then he did it again and zppix demoted me unfairly i would like to discuss this and please help me someone? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And theres no policy against removing messages from his talk. Therefore you abuse block. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No, all I did was revoked his talk privileges that is no abuse, ya know I am gonna report you to john lewis and SPF I am tired of your power abuse and plus it was a block discussion he does not need to remove, demoted me without discussion with fellow colleagues. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * (Note from another Consul) I'd just like to point out that it was a valid demotion. You abused local sysop in contravention of the Blocking policy to basically solve an edit war you were involved with. This was inappropriate and I see no reason to call it an unfair demotion.

Pup (talk) 00:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

It is power abuse for a he Did not discuss before demoting he did it without consulting with fellow Collages that is what makes it power abuse. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 2 Consuls atleast (myself and puppykun) agree the removal was ok. Appeal denied. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 13:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally, I do not think the removal of crat permissions here was justified at all. Even if the removal of talk page access was 100% wrong, attempts to work with the user or at the very least warnings should have been given. It should never be appropriate to immediately remove permissions upon a single mistake when done in good faith. In addition, the user who was blocked continously removed content after already being told not to once (w:WP:OWNTALK does not apply to removing unblock discussions while still blocked), so you could very easily make the argument that the removal of talk page access was justified here. Overall I do not see a reason for crat permissions to be removed at all and would strongly support the restoration of them. Naleksuh (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

i just want to mention i did warn him 2 times to stop removing the conversation as i knew others would  reply to it as well, therefore, that is my reason for the removal of his talk page privileges i do agree I was not given any warnings before and  i will be emailing John or Southpark to override zppix. zppix please make your case you clearly power abused. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, please don't make threats, as that doesn't make the user anymore likely to undemote you. It just aggravates them. You of all people know how that feels. 17:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi everyone i have sent a message to join and will be pausing this matter till John has time to get involved in it thank you for all your help to resolve this matter  --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, John does not have local rights here, and stewards cannot interfere with local administration, unless its in violation of a global policy. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 23:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)