User talk:Cocopuff2018

Test --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

test
test 1234

Another test
test page 1234 --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

unfair demotion
i told black widow to stop removing the conversation as it was legit unnecessary and he did not listen so then he did it again and zppix demoted me unfairly i would like to discuss this and please help me someone? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And theres no policy against removing messages from his talk. Therefore you abuse block. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No, all I did was revoked his talk privileges that is no abuse, ya know I am gonna report you to john lewis and SPF I am tired of your power abuse and plus it was a block discussion he does not need to remove, demoted me without discussion with fellow colleagues. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * (Note from another Consul) I'd just like to point out that it was a valid demotion. You abused local sysop in contravention of the Blocking policy to basically solve an edit war you were involved with. This was inappropriate and I see no reason to call it an unfair demotion.

Pup (talk) 00:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

It is power abuse for a he Did not discuss before demoting he did it without consulting with fellow Collages that is what makes it power abuse. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 2 Consuls atleast (myself and puppykun) agree the removal was ok. Appeal denied. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 13:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally, I do not think the removal here was justified at all. Even if the removal of talk page access was 100% wrong, attempts to work with the user or at the very least warnings should have been given. It should never be appropriate to immediately remove permissions upon a single mistake when done in good faith. In addition, the user continously removed content after already being told not to once (w:WP:OWNTALK does not apply to removing unblock discussions while still blocked), so you could very easily make the argument that the removal of talk page access was justified. Overall I do not see a reason for it to be removed at all and would strongly support restoration of crat permissions. Naleksuh (talk) 02:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)