User talk:Testingthisthing

Bad tests
If you are going to treat the admin tools like toys and play with policy pages again, I am going to take away your admin tools and block you. You should not be testing on pages like Request permissions which you have done by hiding this diff which was absolutely inappropriate. It is in Category:Non-test pages, and it is very clear because when you look at that category, it says "You should not test on these pages." It is very clear that you should not test pages in that category so if I catch you testing on non-test pages again, I am taking away your tools and you will be blocked. Secondly, I am not happy that you are blocking users for more than two hours randomly. The admin tools are not toys and should not be used to block users indefinitely or for more than two hours and you did that to three users which was absolutely inappropriate. Finally, the think that I am slightly not happy with is that you are giving out "autopatrolled" and "rollback" to random users saying that they are "trusted" when they have been inactive for a long time. Please do not do this again. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Very well, my Lord. I shall obey. --- Testing this Thing   08:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

talk
the whole fiasco is stupid. so is the CU team over there. Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't create an accounts to engage any editing on Wikipedia, you should aware that is a lot of CU pistols on Wikipedia monitoring you, as I had email chats with you in the past ago. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes. The fiasco is indeed stupid. I don't know if the CheckUser team is too or not, but I believe they are only doing their jobs. It is understandable why a sockpuppeting sockpuppeteer like Artix would think that way against CUs but it is also reflective on indecorousness. I too am one but I don't ever let emotions and sentiments to get ahead in my confabulating. Warren Buffett once said "You will continue to suffer if you have an emotional reaction to everything that is said to you. True power is sitting back and observing things with magic. True power is restraint. If words control you that means everyone else can control you". --- Testing this Thing   11:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey testing, wanna chat by email? I will explain a lot more. Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure, let's go. ---  Testing this Thing   05:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Artix didn't settled his email on here, I send you his and my email address. You occasionally can email me any questions regarding the Wikipedia community issue, but I am quite busy on real life time, so may not respond you so swiftly, you can also have an chats with him on my domain wiki as well. :) SA</b> 1</b>3</b> B</b>r</b>o</b> (talk) 10:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * son, that is not appropriate. ---  Testing this Thing   10:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Recent deletions
Hey, I can understand how opinions might change, and that you may want to take back words you've said relating to a particular matter. But, the use of the deletion and revision deletion tools for this purpose is inappropriate. The access of admins and bureaucrats on this wiki is limited to testing purposes, and this strays from that. Additionally, just about anyone on this wiki can still see those revisions. If you have comments or concerns, please contact me (use email for anything private). -- Void  Whispers 21:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * An excellency, you is am. ---  Testing this Thing   13:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment on Proposal to 'reduce indefinite to two years'
Eyy. --- Testing this Thing   13:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Corrupt admins must be removed from their positions
The glorification of Wikipedia admins must stop! They are wicked and evil, and only protect each other from accountability. There needs to be checks and balances to make sure the corrupt admins get punished and put away from abusing their privileges. --- Testing this Thing   11:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Hypocrit
"If you have a general Kudpung case people are going to throw up every disagreement they've ever had with him, and you can make a case for desysoping literally any admin by throwing together their worst moments": This guy has no issue doing the same against non-admins and ultimately getting them sanctioned by his cabal after bringing up all of the users' past issues but immediately becomes worried when the same happens in a reasonable case request against a controversial and unfit admin who is a known sexist, transphobe and one who has, for years, acted with extreme condescension. Very, very hypocritical and only strengthens the reality of woke non-admins being treated like "second-class citizens". Sack these despicable, corrupt and pathetic admins! --- Testing this Thing   09:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification of Pending Removal of Rights
Hello,

In accordance with Inactivity, I am writing to inform you that your user rights will be removed on or after 07 May 2020 if you do not return to activity.

Please inform me if you would like to retain your rights and/or be made exempt from inactivity rules.

In the event you wish to return to TestWiki after the above date, you may re-request rights via Request permissions.

Thanks,
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of RhinosF1 (talk)
 * For the Consul Team
 * 09:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Final Reminder: Activity
Hello,

As this is the first run of the new inactivity policy and many of you have been caught out by this, I am writing to remind you that your user rights will be removed tomorrow if you do not return to activity or request an exemption by then.

Thanks,
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of RhinosF1
 * For the Consul Team
 * 09:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)