TestWiki:Request permissions

From TestWiki
Revision as of 14:03, 8 April 2021 by Zppix (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Note: Unregistered users cannot be granted permissions. Please log in if you want to request permissions here.

Request Permissions
What is this page used for?
  • If you want to request testing permissions, you've come to the right place!
Tips for a successful request:
  • Be sure to replace Requested right with the right you are requesting. You'll see what we're talking about once you hit "Request permissions" below
Important Notes
Request


Example (Example Permission)

Example (talk) 00:00, 01 January 1970 (UTC)

 Done. DoNotArchiveUntil (talk) 23:59, 31 December 2499 (UTC)


AnnAngela (Admin)

AnnAngela (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I realized that this wiki doesn't have SecurePoll, forget it and deny please. -AnnAngela (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, we don't have it. Not done. --Anton (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Fredster33 (Admin)

Fredster33 (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@Fredster33: You cannot edit public JavaScript files using only Administrator, however, you can edit Special:MyPage/common.js to make JavaScript which will only affect you. Naleksuh (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 Done: I did this thoughtfully. But because the user says'll use also block feature, I  granted the admin flag. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Thank you. --Anton (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Olipino (Admin/Bureaucrats)

Olipino (talk) 06:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Administrator rights granted. You can only ask for the rights of a bureaucrat later. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Anton (talk) 07:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 Bureaucrat done: per TestWiki:Bureaucrats (account must be at least 24 hours old and have at least 10 edits) when requested yesterday, this user has not been granted bureaucrat rights. Now this account is old enough and compliant. See also User talk:Olipino. --Anton (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Theory of Eternity (Admin)

Theory of Eternity (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Anton (talk) 11:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Theory of Eternity (Admin)

Theory of Eternity (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Not done I'm not satisfied with your apparent confirmation edit on an account created just today and which has zero edits. Moreover, given the outstanding outstanding concerns related to abuse of multiple accounts on Test Wiki, restoration of rights will not be considered at this time. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Joritochip (Administrator)

Joritochip (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Dmehus (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Olipino (Interface Administrator)

Olipino (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I can’t grant these permissions because bureaucrats can’t grant this, but usually interface administrator permissions are not a test right. Dmehus, renovating, if I'm wrong (thanks)? Currently, this wiki has two interface admins: me and another. I think two is enough interface admin, because at the moment this wiki is also with the technical side all very well. This was not an official decision, but my opinion. Thank you. --Anton (talk) 14:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Olipino There is no specific number of interface administrators, so I would certainly consider granting this user group with a demonstrated need. However, you say your reason is to "help manage system messages." This doesn't need interface administrator permissions, as any sysop with the editinterface user right is able to edit MediaWiki system messages in MediaWiki: namespace. Dmehus (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Dmehus, please proceed to what you think should be done here. I would like to edit JavaScript or CSS interface files if there is the need. You may be informed that I requested an edit on a js file because I thought there was a need to edit but the conclusion was something different. – Olipino (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. This is a bit better, but can you elaborate on the type of editing you wish to make to existing gadgets, which gadget(s) you wish to focus on, or which gadget(s) you think could be useful for TestWiki? Dmehus (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Dmehus, I need to be careful to edit those files because those affect all users rather than only one user (the performer). I will focus on discussion gadgets because they seem to be very useful while discussing something. I'd like to make a gadget similar w:User:Enterprisey/reply-link.js on enwiki. But for editing it, I will (probably) require interface-admin bit. – Olipino (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
That one in particular was the predecessor to the DiscussionTools extension, so may not be needed here. Dmehus (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
I've  enabled the DiscussionTools extension on this page, per your request. Dmehus (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Dmehus, thank you for enabling it. What about giving the interface admin bit to my account? -- Jusl¡t (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
That can be done when you elaborate more specifically on your need for the bit, as described here. Dmehus (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Joritochip (Bureaucrat)

Joritochip (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Olipino (Interface Administrator)

-- Jusl¡t (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Why do we need it? I think you should copy that code first to your own common.js page. There is almost no vandalism on this wiki for which that script is intended. --Anton (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Anton, that script will not only help to revert vandalism. It will restore any version that is archived in the page history. Take the example of your own sandbox/test page (if you have), only you make edits on that page and you cannot use rollback on that page. In that circumstances, this tool will help to restore any version of the page. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I know what is Restorer. I can make Restorer to Gadgets, if you want. But I don't know why. --Anton (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Anton, wait! Don't make. Let me do it if I will be granted the bit. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay, good luck for requesting! --Anton (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Not done I am not convinced that the script is needed, or needed sitewide. Therefore no need for the user right to be granted Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 14:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)