- 那我是干了坏事么…… --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- 他被真正的管理员封禁了，理由是“确认为傀儡”。--Amanojaku (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- “Sock of LP; behavioral evidence”，然并不知道LP是谁。--Tiger (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Request permissions page[edit source]
Hi, I've noticed there has been an odd discussion for the "Tiger-test" account on the Request Permission page. In the future, if you are not sure please don't deny a request, just leave it to someone else. Reception123 (talk) 05:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
test MMS[edit source]
Test MMS[edit source]
test. Yeah thisInvalid use of 'this' outside of a non-static member function. <!--is--> a test. Let's spam!!!!! Let's vandalize!!!!
- Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
封禁 / Block[edit source]
从过滤日志上看，既然“不允许”已经能够阻止广告，那么就不需要开封禁了。我觉得封那三个用户已经多余了——封禁无害，不封无妨。（英语是写给其他用户看的） / Now that the abuse filter can prevent spam successfully according to the abuse filter log, it's not necessary to enable blocking. I think that blocking those three users is redundant -- It's not harmful to preform the block but it doesn't matter if not doing it. --Amanojaku (talk) 06:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)