TestWiki

TestWiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Project page Discussion

TestWiki:Community portal (edit)

Revision as of 01:04, 8 January 2023

66,661 bytes removed ,  1 year ago
Manually archiving old threads
VisualWikitext
(username removed)
(Manually archiving old threads)
Line 3:
<br />
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
 
 
== [[TestWiki:Request permissions]] ==
 
Hello. One user requested permissions without having written what permissions. In case he does not answer in how many days the request must be closed? Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|Fffv7787]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 14:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 
:@[[User:AlPaD|Fffv7787]] I think such those request should be closed immediately. I did not find much in the [[TestWiki:Testing policy#Requesting permissions|policy]] --[[User:MdsShakil|MdsShakil]] ([[User talk:MdsShakil|talk]]) 14:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
::@[[User:MdsShakil|MdsShakil]] Thank you! [[User:AlPaD|Fffv7787]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 14:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
:::Hello. [[User:AlPaD|Fffv7787]] and {{u|MdsShakil}}, no! Such requests should not be closed (declined) immediately. The best practice to deal with such requests is to ask which permissions they want and put the request on hold. If they didn't reply close the request as stale after the few days (preferable after 4-5 days). --[[User:Startus|Mazzaz]] ([[User talk:Startus|talk]]) 14:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
::::@[[User:Startus|Mazzaz]] Hello. I reopen this request. [[User:AlPaD|Fffv7787]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 15:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
:[[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]], [[User:Startus|Magogre]], and [[User:MdsShakil|MdsShakil]], I thought I'd jump in to clarify the uncertainty in response to AlPa's question. Magogre's response is generally correct, but there's not a specific timeframe. It really depends. It could be two or three days, or 4-7 days, and then closed as stale, but yeah, basically (a) don't close it immediately and (b) don't close it as ''declined''; rather, use ''stale''. Hope that helps. :) [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 04:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 
== Request for Consul: [[User:Startus|Magogre]] ==
 
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::This is a [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith and intentioned]] request for [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] from a generally helpful, active, and positive [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] and [[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]] on TestWiki, so the candidate is thanked both for their activity, continuing to help users, and for putting their name forward for consideration for Consul. There ''is'' [[w:WP:CON|consensus]] here that the candidate is generally helpful, active, and pleasant; however, as to whether there is a ''need'' for additional need for additional Consuls, given that we currently have six Consuls, five of which ''do'' hold other global roles, there's no consensus, given the workload required of Consuls, some of which is partially automated as Naleksuh notes. As well, there's not yet consensus here that the candidate is sufficiently experienced to undertake those duties. That being said, the candidate is encouraged to being active on TestWiki, and to notifying any Consuls should there be the rare occasion where they can't undertake a certain action (namely, [[Special:ManageWiki|ManageWiki]]-related actions or <code>[[TestWiki:Interface administrators|interface-admin]]</code> permissions requests). Where a user requests, and qualifies for, <code>[[TestWiki:Interwiki administrators|interwiki-admin]]</code> on TestWiki, the candidate can reach out to any of three of the Consuls to effect in their [[m:Stewards|Steward]] capacities. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 04:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
----
 
{{userlinks|Startus}}.
 
Hello, I am Magogre. I have been around since the past few months translating and assigning permissions to users at [[TestWiki:Request permissions]]. I would like to request the consul rights to help out in removing the rights of the inactive admins, thereby, helping to reduce the workload of the current consuls which are stewards or sysadmins. Thank you for considering, --[[User:Startus|Magogre]] ([[User talk:Startus|talk]]) 08:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 
* {{support}}Very helpful and friendly user. [[User:AlPaD|Fffv7️⃣7️⃣8️⃣7️⃣]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 11:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
* {{Weak oppose}} - really you are a good contributor but I think you have needed little more experience for this role. Your [[Special:Diff/36830|1st edit]] in this wiki only 2 months ago --[[User:MdsShakil|MdsShakil]] ([[User talk:MdsShakil|talk]]) 13:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
*:Thank you for expressing your opinion. The edit you are referring to, was made on 14 June and it has been 3 months since then. I know this may be an early case but keeping in view the work stewards and sysadmins regularly do on meta, phab and elsewhere, I can help help to perform the consul duties on this wiki to ease their work here. --[[User:Startus|Magogre]] ([[User talk:Startus|talk]]) 16:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
* {{support}} Friendly and helpful [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 05:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
* I oppose, there is certainly not any "strong workload" and I've never heard of you until this request. Also, the removal of inactive sysops is done once a month and partially automated. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 08:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
* {{Support}} I agree there is no strong workload but it never hurts to have more volunteers. I patrol TestWiki from the shadows and Mazzaz is incredibly helpful in fulfilling rights requests and not only that, he's helpful across Miraheze globally. Currently, though we have 6 consuls, none of them are active on TestWiki (understandable, most of them occupy global roles) and I believe the addition of Mazzaz would be beneficial to the local community. For this reason, I support this request. [[User:Agent Isai|Agent Isai]] ([[User talk:Agent Isai|talk]]) 04:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
* {{Oppose|Weak}} While I admit I don't know Magogre, I have seen from his contributiona that he has been generally helpful on TestWiki. Nonetheless, I don't really think there's another need for a Consul at this time as the workload is manageable by the current consuls. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 07:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
 
== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-10-7 ==
 
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::This has been done {{Done|[[Special:Diff/39459#Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-10-09|done]]}} by a [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]], so this effort, while in [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]] albeit incorrect, from a procedural point of view, is moot. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
----
 
The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-10-7''' if they do not return to activity:
*{{RFP/User|50829X}}
*{{RFP/User|Ameisenigel}}
*{{RFP/User|Avengium}}
*{{RFP/User|HeartsDo}}
*{{RFP/User|Heidenlarm}}
*{{RFP/User|Lily}}
*{{RFP/User|Repolho123456}}
*{{RFP/User|Rots62}}
*{{RFP/User|Scian}}
*{{RFP/User|SHEIKH}}
*{{RFP/User|Tomasulo}}
*{{RFP/User|Vulpix037}}
*{{RFP/User|Walhouse}}
*{{RFP/User|ロープTA}}
 
Thanks,
:[[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 04:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
:on Behalf of Consul Team
:2021-10-7
::Hi, you are not a consul and by policy unable to do this. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 15:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
::Hey sorry can you do that then? I think I will withdraw if we switch places. [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 16:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
:::@[[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 21:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
::::@[[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] hey I am really waiting for your answer {{thank you}} [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 12:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
:::::hello @[[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] I need to take action, Please let me know if what I am doing possibly is wrong. {{thank you}} [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 12:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
::::::per policy mission dismissed [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 03:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
 
== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-10-09 ==
 
The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-10-16''' if they do not return to activity:
 
* <s>{{RFP/User|HeartsDo}}</s> now [https://publictestwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Topic:Wi4432miydoc959l&topic_postId=wi5m9tzg1au4mbc8&topic_revId=wi5m9tzg1au4mbc8&action=single-view active]
* {{RFP/User|Heidenlarm}}
* {{RFP/User|Lily}}
* {{RFP/User|Repolho123456}}
* {{RFP/User|Rots62}}
* {{RFP/User|Scian}}
* {{RFP/User|SHEIKH}}
* {{RFP/User|Tomasulo}}
* {{RFP/User|Vulpix037}}
* {{RFP/User|Walhouse}}
* {{RFP/User|ロープTA}}
 
Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:22:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC) [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 
:{{Done|Rights removed from ten (10) users}}, noting that [[User:HeartsDo|HeartsDo]] was [[Special:Diff/39559|given]] a temporary, three-month [[TestWiki:Inactivity/Exceptions|inactivity exception]], with [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] discretion due to their [https://publictestwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Topic:Wi4432miydoc959l&topic_postId=wi5m9tzg1au4mbc8&topic_revId=wi5m9tzg1au4mbc8&action=single-view activity] from [[mw:Extension:StructuredDiscussions|StructuredDiscussions]] seemingly not counting. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
 
== New policy [[TestWiki:Abuse filter policy|for abuse filter]] ==
 
Hello guys, I am [[User:Matttest|Matttest]]. I have created a new proposed-for-policy page for abuse filter. In fact now there are no policies or guidelines related to the abuse filter test, and I think it’s better to create one. Currently, I think this page can be merge into the TestWiki policy [[TestWiki:Main policy]]. What do you think? Please give some suggestions for the community. You may also change this proposal page. Regards, —-[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 09:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
:P.S. I think the testing of abuse filter is a serious action, and it may be misused. It has its importance to be part of the policy of TestWiki (and maybe by merging to [[TestWiki:Main policy]] or [[TestWiki:Testing policy]]). I hope you guys can give out some opinions concerning this. [[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 10:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 
== TNT module ==
 
Why does [[Template:Miramoji|my module]] that works good in meta doesn't work here? The imported module here links to Module:TNT for some reason, TNT does nothing for the template, and there's not even an invoke code or require code in lua [[User:Anpang|Anpang]] ([[User talk:Anpang|talk]]) 08:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 
== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-12-27 ==
 
The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2022-01-02''' if they do not return to activity:
 
* {{RFP/User|54nd60x}}
* {{RFP/User|Anton}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Chrs}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/40417|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Aspallar}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|C1K98V}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/40410|active]]
* {{RFP/User|DarkPaladin125}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Dot}}</s> now [[Special:Redirect/logid/19866|active]]
* {{RFP/User|FFFFF+1}}
* {{RFP/User|Hykell}}
* {{RFP/User|InspecterAbdel}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Jonathan5566}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/40419|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Joritochip}}
* {{RFP/User|MONUMENTA}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|MacFan4000}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/40409|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Nightwolf1223}}
* {{RFP/User|Prodipto Deloar}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|QueerEcofeminist}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/40411|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Soronos}}
* {{RFP/User|SoyokoAnis}}
* {{RFP/User|Тишина}}
* {{RFP/User|ぴの＊えむ}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|メイプルポイ}}</s> now [[Special:Permalink/40480|active]]
 
Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:03:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
:{{Done|Rights removed from fifteen (15) users}}. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 07:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 
== How do I restore this page? ==
 
https://publictestwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Main_Page/fi&action=edit&redlink=1
I deleted this as a test but can't figure out how to restore it. [[User:Lugia Ann|Lugia Ann]] ([[User talk:Lugia Ann|talk]]) 03:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 
:[[User:Lugia Ann|Lugia Ann]], that is a translation subpage, so you cannot/should not restore it in the traditional way. You have to either import the translations using the [[mw:Extension:Translate|Translate]] extension, or just retranslate it. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
::Okay, I will see if I can use those ways to restore the page. [[User:Lugia Ann|Lugia Ann]] ([[User talk:Lugia Ann|talk]]) 03:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 
== Consul request - unprotect ==
 
[https://test.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ProtectedPages?namespace=8&type=edit&level=consul&size-mode=min&size= These pages] should be unprotected. They were protected back when crats could assign interface-admin as a security precaution, but now only consuls can assign it. They should be unprotected so authorized interface-admins can edit them. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 01:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:Though the CSS and JS script pages are sensitive from a security standpoint, I'd be willing to lower protection for the skin-specific CSS/JS pages to <code>[[TestWiki:Interface administrators|interface-admin]]</code>, on a provisional basis; however, the reasons by which [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]], [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]], [[MediaWiki:Common.css]], and [[MediaWiki:Common.js]] are [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]]-protected is because these either control the sitewide CSS/JS for ''everyone'' or they relate to matters which are within the purview of the non-test bureaucrats on TestWiki, Consuls. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|Dmehus}} First, Common.js and Common.css are protected for security reasons (infact, they were incorrectly protected before until I had Void fix it), second, interface admin is a non-testing group, and non-test edits are permitted. It is the same reason I have interface admin. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 23:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
:::[[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]], yes, I remember that the pages in question were protected with creation protection rather than as blank pages with edit protection, and I thank you for your report. However, <code>[[TestWiki:Interface administrators|interface-admin]]</code> is not, strictly speaking, a non-test permission. It is somewhat of a hybrid test/non-test permission. Regardless, it is nonetheless a [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]]-delegated role, and I'm both (a) not seeing a high volume of edit requests that Consuls cannot handle for these pages and (b) given the widespread end user impacts [[MediaWiki:Common.css]], and [[MediaWiki:Common.js]] can have, I'm inclined to defer to the pre-existing Consul practice of maintaining these at Consul protection. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
::::{{hidden ping|Dmehus}} If that's the case, then there's no reason to have the interface-admin group at all, might as well delete it. Right now, interface-admins can editsitejs except for the part where they can't because it was protected, and was only protected back when it could be assigned by anyone. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 23:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::Well, the group ''was'' deleted before, but I ''can'' see a valid reasons for non-Consuls to be able to perform gadget maintenance, upgrades, and various other tasks on TestWiki. I ''can'' also see a weaker case for it being used for testing changes before deploying to a non-TestWiki Miraheze wiki or another wiki. The idea is that it can be used for both testing and non-testing purposes, but rather than the permission being ''granted'' by any [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]], which any user can request, ''in theory'' if not ''in practice'', after they have made at least ten (10) editing contributions and had an account for at least four (4) days, it was felt that was too weak of a granting criteria. For those reasons, I see a case for maintaining the group, but I'd certainly be open to hearing what other users, and especially interface administrators, have to say on the matter [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::: I was not suggesting deleting the group, that was rhetorical. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 00:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 
== Inactive Rights Removal - 2022-02-19 ==
 
The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2022-02-26''' if they do not return to activity:
 
* {{RFP/User|-Haryad}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Avengium}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/41293|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Conspirational}}
* {{RFP/User|FrancisM56}}
* {{RFP/User|IronclawFan}}
* {{RFP/User|MirahezeBots}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|MrApocalisse}}</s> now [[Special:Redirect/logid/20922|active]]
* {{RFP/User|Oscitare}}
* {{RFP/User|PorkchopGMX}}
* {{RFP/User|SakuraHanaExperiment}}
* {{RFP/User|U.ayaao.p}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Ugochimobi}}</s> now [https://publictestwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Topic:Wqcfr1upravmgol9&topic_showPostId=wqcfr1upretoosjh#flow-post-wqcfr1upretoosjh active]
* {{RFP/User|Vicckz}}
 
Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:23:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
::{{Done|Ten (10) users removed}} per the above, with an administrative note to [[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]]. [[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]], please note that, going forward, [[mw:Extension:StructuredDiscussions|StructuredDiscussions]] activity is ''not'' counted as ''activity'', pending a fix to the [[User:Void/findInactiveSysops.js|the inactivity script]] by Void, so you will need to demonstrate some other form of activity by the next time the script is run later in March. Thanks. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
:::{{Ping|Dmehus}} for example, the edit I made here ? Thanks :) [[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]] ([[User talk:Ugochimobi|talk]]) 23:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
::::[[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]], {{Done|Exactly}}. {{Thank you}}. You are now active for three (3) more months. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::Thank you very much Doug :), it's been a while we actually chatted but I'm sure you're okay 😊 [[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]] ([[User talk:Ugochimobi|talk]]) 23:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== Minor [[Special:Diff/41280|amendment]] to the [[TestWiki:Inactivity]] policy ==
 
I've made the following [[Special:Diff/41280|minor amendment]] to the [[TestWiki:Inactivity]] policy, mainly due to the way in which the <code>[[User:Void/findInactiveSysops.js|findInactiveSysops.js]]</code> script works. Unfortunately, it is not able to consider [[mw:Extension:StructuredDiscussions|StructuredDiscussions]] activity, or is it able to consider edits which are subsequently deleted by another [[TestWiki:Administrators|administrator]]. Views from the community are welcome on this, but ''do'' note that the alternative would be to revert to determining inactivity based on [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] discretion, rather than a semi-automated activity based process. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:51, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
:It's possible to take into account deleted edits by updating the script to make use of [[mw:API:Alldeletedrevisions]], and it should also be possible to take into account StructuredDiscussions activity via parsing the HTML of [[Special:Contributions]]/[[Special:DeletedContributions]] as a final check. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 01:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
::[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]], yeah, [[User:Void|Void]] said on [[m:IRC|IRC]] he figured he'd be able to correct the deleted contributions issue, but hadn't yet found a way to resolve the StructuredDiscussions issue. If you have a way of correcting the latter, I'm sure we could probably temporarily lower protection on [[User:Void/findInactiveSysops.js]] for you. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
:::What can be done is directly requesting [[Special:Contributions]] and [[Special:DeletedContributions]] without using the API so that the Structured Discussions contributions are added, then looking over that in the script to check if the last contribution by the user was via Structured Discussions, and if so, check the timestamp. This should get everything except deleted topics. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 02:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
::::That's not a bad idea, but it's much harder to implement than it sounds, especially considering the likelihood that this would not be consistent for all users. Instead, I have the much more interesting idea of having the API parse <code><nowiki>{{Special:Contributions/<username>}}</nowiki></code>. This, when combined with a few specific options should produce consistent results for all users, provided I can figure out an accurate method for parsing out the timestamp. <span style="text-shadow:7px 5px 7px grey;font-family:High Tower Text">-- [[User:Void|<span style="color:#123524">Void</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Void|<span style="color:#353839">''Whispers''</span>]]</sup></span> 03:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::Sounds interesting. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 04:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
== Request to enable extension ==
 
I'd like to request that the TemplateSandbox extension be enabled. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 02:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 
:[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]], sure, that extension could be quite useful here, so {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/20919|done]]}}. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 06:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== CheckUser ==
 
Hello, for test and information on MediaWiki is it possible for a CheckUser to check [[User:Naleksuh BOT]] and privately send the results back to me? This would need to be done by a consteward, so [[User:Dmehus]] or [[User:Void]] can help, if this is allowed. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 02:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 
:[[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]], getting to your DMs on [[m:IRC|IRC]] as I suspect this is what they are about. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
:This is permitted, per [[m:Data Request Process|Data Request Process]]. Let me clarify with Owen whether he'd prefer Trust and Safety or Stewards to handle this request. It's essentially a limited in scope private user data request. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
::{{hidden ping|Dmehus}}I don't remember any previous conversation but it is not "about" anything I've mentioned to someone else before, it is about something contemporary. I do wish you would stop "getting to" real-time communication though, it defeats the purpose of it. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 03:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
:::Yes, I saw your DMs and that was unrelated to this request. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
::::[[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]], I have received clarification from Owen on this. Either role is capable of handling such requests. It depends on the channel in which was requested. Since you've made the request of Stewards, then it is fair for Stewards to handle it. Would you be able to direct message me on [[m:IRC|IRC]] your preferred method of private data delivery? I assume you'd probably prefer e-mail, but I'd prefer you didn't share your e-mail address publicly. If you have a different preferred private data delivery method, then you can also share that privately as well. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 09:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::{{hidden ping|Dmehus}}Basically I just want anyone with CheckUser access here to load the IP addresses for [[User:Naleksuh BOT]] (as many as can be fetched, 5k in 3 months) and send back the results, either via IRC or [[Special:EmailUser/Naleksuh|email]], whichever works. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 10:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
::::::[[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]], this has now been {{Done|done}}, but is just awaiting further response from you on [[m:IRC|IRC]] to see if you need additional data returned. I'll leave my <code>[[m:CheckUser|checkuser]]</code> flag on for a little bit longer, to provide you an opportunity to reply privately. Thank you. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 18:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== Cannot delete a file ==
 
I uploaded [[:File:Test png.PNG]] for test use,but when I done my test,I cannot delete it.The page tell me "Deleting page: An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-backend"."How can I do then? [[User:SD hehua|SD hehua]] ([[User talk:SD hehua|talk]]) 06:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|SD hehua}} I've opened a ticket on [[m:Phabricator|Phabricator]] regarding this error, please see [[phab:T8913|T8913]] for further details. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 19:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
::Thank you. [[User:SD hehua|SD hehua]] ([[User talk:SD hehua|talk]]) 17:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
----
*fixed--[[User:SD hehua|SD hehua]] ([[User talk:SD hehua|talk]]) 15:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 
== Admin Training/School ==
 
After looking at the main page and finding it talks about a possible admin school existing in the future, I think that we should spend some time creating one, I have an idea currently but it would help if others helped with it, currently my draft of what it could look like is stored in userpage as [[User:Zippybonzo/Admin School]] and I would appreciate if you had time to drop by and help or give some feedback, Thanks, Zippybonzo [[User:Zippybonzo|Zippybonzo]] ([[User talk:Zippybonzo|talk]]) 19:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 
:I'm wanting to import admin guide from Wikipedia which is more information. [[User:Thingofme|Thingofme]] ([[User talk:Thingofme|talk]]) 12:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 
==[[User:Sysop]]==
Hello. This userpage is owned by a user who does not have a local TestWiki account. That's why I suggest deleting it or creating a local account. Thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 12:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 
:[[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]], thank you for noting this. I'm not sure what the story is here, as it was from something like five years ago, but if I had to logically ''guess'' from [[Special:CentralAuth/WikiHow Contributor|WikiHow Contributor]]'s [[Special:Contributions/WikiHow Contributor|local TestWiki contributions]], this was likely their sockpuppet, ''except'' they didn't ever ''use'' it on TestWiki, so no local account was created. Given that an user page ''was'' created, though, I've {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/22630|done]]}} this for you. I actually contemplating giving this account a courtesy global rename, but on the other hand, doing so could allow the username to be recreated on a wiki where a local bureaucrat has the user right to override the [[m:Title blacklist|title blacklist]], so likely will leave as is. I'm not sure what point there is to keeping the user page on TestWiki, though. So, if you want to delete it, that'd be fine, but ''do'' remove the page protection first before doing so. Thanks. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
::{{Ping|Dmehus}} Hello! Global hide (centralauth-oversight) it's a good idea? Thank you! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 06:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 
== De-Sysop Request ==
 
Considering some not-so-wise things I have done here lately, I think it would be best if I take a step down for a bit. I will be blocking myself from some namespaces until May 1, and I would appreciate it if someone could remove my sysop permissions for now. When I come back on May 1, I will re-ask for both sysop and bureaucrat (assuming that's okay). My talk page will be open for any questions or comments. If anyone feels the need to adjust the block in any way, feel free to do it.
 
Thank you and I'm sorry for the trouble I've caused here so far. I hope that after this break things will go more smoothly. [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 16:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|ApexAgunomu}} {{Done}} [[User:HeartsDo|HeartsDo]] ([[User talk:HeartsDo|talk]]) 16:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
==[[TestWiki:Consuls]]==
Hello! Could you inform on the page that bureaucrats aren't allowed to grant a bot flag? Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 16:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 
:[[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]], {{Done|[[Special:Diff/43575|Done]]}}. Thank you for identifying this. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 18:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 
== MediaWiki version ==
 
I think we should upgrade this wiki to 1.39. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 06:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 
:Absolutely not. That's an alpha version. Have you seen how many bugs are caught each train week? [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 06:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
:Maybe we should wait for Miraheze update. [[User:SD hehua|SD hehua]] ([[User talk:SD hehua|talk]]) 15:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|LisafBia}} I guess you should check out [[:mw:MediaWiki 1.39|this]] first. This version is not a stable version - the latest stable version is still 1.37.2 (even 1.38 is in beta version). Furthermore, upgrading mediawiki versions is a global issue, so it should be posted at meta. --[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 07:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
:::I suggested this idea because this is a test wiki. I knew the version was unstable. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 15:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
::::This is not where we test that MediaWiki works. It's to allow users to work out how to use the software. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 21:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 
== PageImages extension ==
 
Can the [[:mw:Extension:PageImages]] extension be enabled here? It's part of MediaWiki, but needs to be enabled in LocalSettings.php. --[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|<span style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:-.3em;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK<br />PAGE</span>]]) 20:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 
:{{done}} via ManageWiki, we don't use LocalSettings.php for most changes at Miraheze [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 21:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
::@[[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] Thanks. I can't seem to get it to recognize [[Mediawiki:Pageimages-denylist]]. If the settings at https://github.com/miraheze/mw-config/blob/master/LocalSettings.php are current, it looks like wgPageImagesDenylist is disabled everywhere but gratispaideiawiki. Can the settings from gratispaideiawiki be copied to testwiki? --[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|<span style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:-.3em;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK<br />PAGE</span>]]) 14:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
:::This should be {{done|Deployed}} within 30 minutes. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 09:15, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 
== New policy [[TestWiki:Protection policy|about protection for non-test pages]] ==
Hello, I am [[User:Matttest|Matttest]]. Currently there is no policies about which non-test pages should be protected at which protection level, but I think it is important given that [https://publictestwiki.com/wiki/Special:Log?type=protect&user=&page=TestWiki%3ABureaucrats&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype= there are disputes on protecting non-test pages], so I drafted this policy. Any comments on this policy will be appreciated and feel free to change this proposed policy. Regards, [[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 05:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 
== Inactivity ==
 
[[User:Zfshuo]]
This user has not edited in over 3 months. @[[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] @[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 13:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 
:I will run the report at the weekend. Please don't remove rights without giving proper warning. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 14:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
::{{ping|LisafBia}} Please consider [[TW:Community portal#Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-10-7|this case]] in the community portal. Users who are inactive for 3 months should be reminded at their talk page, before removing his/her rights (should be done a week later after the warning according to the policy). The action should also be done by a consul, not a bureaucrat. --[[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 06:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
:[[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]], {{Done|[[Special:Diff/43956|Done]]}}. Thank you for the reminder! [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 
== Inactive Rights Removal - 2022-05-21 ==
 
The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2022-05-28''' if they do not return to activity:
 
* <s>{{RFP/User|50829!}}</s> [[Special:Diff/44063|active as of 27 May 2022]]
* {{RFP/User|Andrei Jiroh Experiments}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Avengium}}</s> [[Special:Permalink/43979|active as of 22 May 2022]]
* {{RFP/User|DancingSmurfMH}}
* {{RFP/User|Dot}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|Dross}}</s> [[Special:Diff/44038|active as of 26 May 2022]]
* {{RFP/User|Giacomo2}}
* {{RFP/User|Jonathan5566}}
* {{RFP/User|Jrayq}}
* {{RFP/User|Justarandomamerican}}
* {{RFP/User|MrApocalisse}}
* {{RFP/User|Pastures}}
* {{RFP/User|Shuuless}}
* {{RFP/User|SoyokoAnis}}
* {{RFP/User|Techwizzie}}
* {{RFP/User|TheSystemGuy}}
* {{RFP/User|TylerMagee}}
* {{RFP/User|Zfshuo}}
* {{RFP/User|Антаркт}}
* {{RFP/User|ওহিদ}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|খাত্তাব হাসান}}</s> [[Special:Diff/43968|active as of 22 May 2022]]
* {{RFP/User|アンジェロ先輩}}
* <s>{{RFP/User|メイプルポイ}}</s> [[Special:Diff/43967|active as of 22 May 2022]]
 
Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:23:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
::@[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]]: Please, don't remove my rights right now. I'll increase my activity next month. Although, since last March I have been almost inactive on all wikis. [[User:খাত্তাব হাসান|খাত্তাব হাসান]] ([[User talk:খাত্তাব হাসান|talk]]) 08:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 
:{{ping|খাত্তাব হাসান}} Your comment in reply is enough to stop you going inactive. Your rights will now remain for another 3 months. Please try and make an edit at least once every 80 or so days. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 09:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
:{{Done|Eighteen (18) inactive user permissions removed}} from this batch. A forthcoming notice of the ''current'' inactive users will follow shortly. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 
== Community Ban Request: ApexAgunomu ==
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::Keeping in mind the comments made by John in his revert of the original close, I am now reclosing this discussion as successful. There are 8 support votes and 0 opposes, therefore making support unanimous for the proposal. In terms of due process, ApexAgunomu is free to appeal this ban to the community at a later time. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 05:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
----
Hello all,
 
I'm left with bringing this to the community as it's been actioned by Consuls only on various occasions and the current status is not doing us much good.
 
Apex was unlocked and had their ban removed on TestWiki by {{User|Dmehus}} and was given a very generous chance by myself to allow them to quickly get to testing.
 
Since then, Apex has ignored every piece of advice & restriction put in place. Today, they moved to posting comments with swear words to avoid getting caught by the abuse filter supposed to be their to give guidance which has numerous hits showing them breaking policy.
 
Apex has been blocked & unblocked since the unlock on numerous occasions with the most recent being removed by Doug way before expiry.
 
I am therefore asking the community to present their opinion on Apex's sanctions and proposing an indefinite community ban as I do not believe simply adding restrictions for every time something inappropriate is done will be sustainable.
 
As a community ban, it would only be appealable via a community discussion where consensus was reached.
 
Thanks, [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 09:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Reply from ApexAgunomu ===
I am honestly surprised to see this proposal since I honestly was trying to make good edits earlier today, and while I realize it has 100% support for going through, I would be very grateful if I could have one last chance to test here and show that I can obey the rules here. I thought that since my disruptive actions were being stopped by the filter, there was no harm if I "slipped up". But I see that I need to show that I have actually changed my behavior, by not setting off the filter in the first place.
 
Here are my proposals to remedy this situation.
 
#Modify the filter to only allow userspace edits (for however long is necessary)
#Restriction from requesting admin or bureaucrat for whatever time
#A clear understanding that attempts to edit around the filter or triggering the filter will result in the ban being placed.
 
If this proposal is accepted, I will abide by these restrictions and understand very clearly that this is my last chance to test on this wiki. [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 02:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Support ban ===
# As proposed [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 09:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
# Apex's actions speak far louder than their words. They claim to want to do better, but every time they are unlocked/unbanned, they go right back to the same behaviors that got them banned in the first place. I believe it is time to treat these actions for what they are: trolling. Apex should be indefinitely blocked just like any other troll would be. [[User:Sario528|Sario528]] ([[User talk:Sario528|talk]]) 16:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{support}} I've been watching this user for a solitude of 2 ½ months now, and all I have seen was nothing but [[w:WP:DISRUPTSIGNS|disruption]] over and over again. --[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]] ([[User talk:DarkMatterMan4500|talk]]) 16:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{Support}} Just be able to send email and write on her talk page. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 19:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
# Per above, I have nothing to add and per my obversavtion after the unblock, nothing have really changed (just stopped by the filter) [[User:HeartsDo|HeartsDo]] ([[User talk:HeartsDo|talk]]) 19:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{support}} I tried to assume good faith, but the fact is that everytime he is unblocked, the policies are violated and almost all the log actions done are disruptive behaviours. [[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 03:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{support}} Regrettably, I see no other way forward. The user has been given enough chances to abide by the polices. [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]] ([[User talk:Universal Omega|talk]]) 06:55, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{Support}} per above. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 16:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Oppose ban, support other restrictions ===
# <del> I understand that the user has made many mistakes (inappropriate commentsand etc), but she has also made good-faith actions. I believe that there should be restrictions, although my indefinite ban seems excessive. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 13:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)</del>
#:{{ping|AIPaD}} Can you please explain why you think other restrictions might work as opposed to a ban? We've already tried putting them in place a few times. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 15:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#::{{Ping|RhinosF1}} I still hope that at some point she will be able to follow the rules. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 18:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#:::So do I but to suggest implementing restrictions then they need to be defined or it becomes a proposal that's not actionable. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 18:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#::::I'm thinking of Consuls blocking her from the Wiki, but to able to write on her talk page and send emails. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 18:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#:::::Then why not support a ban but just put a condition that talk page is left open. The only difference between a ban and block is how it can be appealed. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 19:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#::::::OK thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 19:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
#:::::::I see you voted support after this comment, will you use the <nowiki><del></nowiki> tag on the oppose vote to avoid confusion? [[User:Matttest|Matttest]] ([[User talk:Matttest|talk]]) 03:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
#::::::::{{Ping|Matttest}} Yes, I add tag. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 04:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Support Status Quo ===
=== Oppose restrictions ===
=== General comments ===
I have two questions.
# How long will this discussion be open for?
# Is there any minimum length of time I have to wait before I can appeal this sanction?
[[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 07:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
:3 days minimum and no, there is no minimum time until you can appeal. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 07:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
I have one more question {{ping|RhinosF1}}. Why not just block me if there are problems with my editing here? Why is this being turned into a community ban instead? [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 14:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
:I chose to request a community ban as there has been disagreements among both consuls and involved community members as to what sanctions are appropriate. A community endorsed sanction. This ensures the community can be clear on the best approach. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 15:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 
==== Reverted Closure ====
While "community bans" on TestWiki ''may'' have been done in the past, they are not supported by [[TestWiki:Policies|official policy]]. [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consuls]] ''can'' seek the TestWiki community's input, of course, on a non-binding and advisory basis. Likewise, the same is true for Consuls seeking input on an unblock. The reason for this is because this is two-fold. For one thing, TestWiki, save for its Consuls and a handful of users, is a dynamic community that has high turnover. For another, it provides all users with proper due process, ensuring that Consuls, as the non-test administrators on this wiki, balance the community's frustrations with due process whilst ensuring local control. In other words, a wiki that did not have appropriate due process processes in place may well give rise to the user having standing for a complaint under the [[m:Code of Conduct|a global process]] [[m:Stewards|Stewards]] took over from the former [[m:Code of Conduct/Commission|Code of Conduct Commission]]. In terms of this proposal, it is also noteworthy that RhinosF1 has seemingly been left with no other apparent option, despite [[Special:AbuseFilter/history/60|not making a single attempt]] to modify and add to the abuse filter [[User:Chrs|Chrs]] created. It also noteworthy that no other [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] has supported this proposal. Likewise, perhaps the strongest arguments come from [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] and [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]], which are more supportive of a Consul blocking the user indefinitely than for any sort of ''ban'', which, as mentioned, does not exist in [[TestWiki:Policies|official policy]]. Secondarily, RhinosF1 has not proposed any other alternate proposal, and has almost seemingly held a grudge against ApexAgunomu (nee Bugambilia) since day one. This is evidenced by him ignoring ApexAgunomu's alternate proposal. Finally, because of this lack of due of process and alternate proposals, I will initiate a community discussion, on a non-binding and advisory basis that proposes several options and invites discussion on a fourth unforeseen option. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 04:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
:I have been asked to review this in Steward capacity and having looked at it in some detail, I have made the decision to revert this closure on two grounds;
:# It does not clearly take into account the community's expressed wishes so far,
:# It is a non-sensical closure in favour to promote another vote where the tide of voting seems more leading to a certain resolution in response and contrary to the existing discussion.
:I will respond to the closure line by line to explain my neutral stance on it and why I believe Steward intervention here was appropriate.
:"While "community bans" on TestWiki ''may'' have been done in the past, they are not supported by [[TestWiki:Policies|official policy]]."
:: I concur there is no policy in place, however written under the [[TestWiki:Main policy|main policy]] is: "And for the rest, just use common sense!", which to me means a community discussion about actions should be respected - this is backed up globally in that Stewards have a main responsibility to ensure community consensus is respected, except where policy explicitly prohibits certain actions. I can not see any policy locally or globally which prevents community bans - therefore the discussion surrounding one should be allowed unless the local community have explicitly voted that community bans shouldn't be used or discussed.
:"[[TestWiki:Consuls|Consuls]] ''can'' seek the TestWiki community's input, of course, on a non-binding and advisory basis."
:: This discussion sounds like it is doing this, as the prose reads, "I am therefore asking the community to present their opinion on Apex's sanctions and proposing an indefinite community ban".
:"In other words, a wiki that did not have appropriate due process processes in place may well give rise to the user having standing for a complaint"
::This is indeed true - however a community discussion in the absence of due process sounds like something you can dispute with? Afterall, if the community voted to introduce a ban policy, and then banned them - this would still be dependent on community consensus and would likely end in the same way. One could argue ignoring and preventing community discussion being had could be cause for a complaint under global processes - one which has lead to this decision being reviewed externally and neutrally by myself in my Steward capacity.
:"It also noteworthy that no other [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] has supported this proposal."
::Can you link me to the relevant policy that states a Consul must approve all community discussions taking place?
:"Likewise, perhaps the strongest arguments come from [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] and [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]], which are more supportive of a Consul blocking the user indefinitely than for any sort of ''ban''"
::They both supported the ban in this discussion, and neither strongly provided an argument for a limited block over a ban - in fact Universal Omega made no distinction in his comment for either - AlPaD did make a distinction that sounds more like a block than a ban, but didn't make any strong argument for a block over a ban.
:"RhinosF1 has not proposed any other alternate proposal"
::I don't feel in a discussion about whether to ban a user, another alternative is required - either the community support a ban or do not support a ban.
:"I will initiate a community discussion"
:: You are free to, however, you can not close an active discussion against the consensus that has formed on it just because you do not like the consensus starting to form on it because it does not fall in line with your idea of a "perfect resolution".
:Based on all of this above, I have made the decision based on numerous requests by local testwiki users to intervene and revert this closure to allow the community to discuss the proposal. This can be re-closed based on either consensus or a procedural manner (policy prevents this discussion, the requesting users withdraws it fully, etc.). [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 18:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
::Also just reviewing the discussion below, one of the main reasons for the closing this discussion was that a community ban is not grounded in policy - yet below in your proposals, you propose a 2 way interaction ban. Could you enlighten me on the policy that gives rise to this? [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 18:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Closure Request ===
 
I apologize if I'm not supposed to do this, but I'd rather not have this discussion be dragged out for days on end. And while I really don't want to be banned, it seems unavoidable. So seeing as this discussion has been been open for three days and a clear consensus has been reached, I would ask that both discussions here about me be closed and the agreed-upon remedy be enacted (as much as I don't like it), so we can all move on past this whole thing. Thank you. {{ping|RhinosF1}} {{ping|Dmehus}} [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 04:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
: It's rare to see a closure request from the recipient of the request but acceptance is good. Most active consuls have already !voted. I'll ping [[User:Reception123]] and [[User:Void]] as uninvolved consuls. If it is still open in 24 hours let me know and I will close as an uninvolved bureaucrat (as far as I know, that is allowed in clear cases like this one). [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 04:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
 
== Community advisory opinion to [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consuls]] regarding [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ==
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::There is no consensus for Proposals 1, 2 and 3. There are 4 votes in favour of Proposal 4 however given that the community ban above has already been enacted and this proposal doesn't seem to differ, there is no need to further implement anything. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 05:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
----
RhinosF1 initiated a ''community ban'' proposal re: [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] the other day. Granted, in the past, community "bans" ''may'' have taken place, they are, not, however, supported by [[TestWiki:Policies|official policy]]. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]], as one of two TestWiki co-founding Consuls (alongside NDKilla), and I are wanting to retain TestWiki's spirit of [[w:WP:AGF|assuming good faith]], having only a [[TestWiki:Policies|a very few official rules]].
 
The excellent [[Special:AbuseFilter/60|abuse filter]] [[User:Chrs|Chrs]] created, at my request and having had the support of [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] and [[User:Agent Isai|Agent Isai]], seems to be, for the most part, doing its job. If RhinosF1 is bothered by seeing abuse log hits in the [[libera:#miraheze-feed-test|#miraheze-feed-test]] on [[m:IRC|IRC]], he can easily instruct StreamBotMH to !ignore <code>ApexAgunomu</code> in the channel. Or, alternatively, he can add the <code>[[TestWiki:Flooders|flood]]</code> to ApexAgunomu. Crucially, though, as I and [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] have said elsewhere, any <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> can feel free to tweak the abuse filter in question, to catch anything we've not yet identified.
 
Secondarily, as RhinosF1 has not demonstrated a [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith and -intentioned]] effort to propose alternative solutions for discussion, on a non-binding and advisory basis, of course, he has not met the high burden such a block would need. Likewise, he has similarly ignored ApexAgunomu's offering of other alternate solutions.
 
[[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] and likely [[User:HeartsDo|HeartsDo]]'s comments above show frustration, but ''do'' show that willingness to accept good-faith and to being amenable to alternative solutions. Thus, taking that all into account, I'm proposing the following proposals, each with support sections. Oppose sections are unnecessary, as each proposal would be mutually exclusive of each other, and [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consuls]] would take both the ''number'' of support !votes ''and'' the ''quality'' and ''strength'' of any arguments into consideration in effecting any outcome. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 05:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Proposal 1: Status quo + extension of abuse filter restrictions ===
ApexAgunomu is subject to the [[Special:AbuseFilter/60|strict abuse filter]] restrictions, originally slated to lapse this week, for an additional thirty days. Consuls will consider the ''severity'' and ''number'' of hits after thirty days in determining whether there has been sufficient improvement to warrant easing or removal of the abuse filter restrictions. Any <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> may add to the abuse filter where ApexAgunomu is getting through the abuse filter.
 
==== Support ====
 
 
=== Proposal 2: Proposal 1 + !ignore ApexAgunomu on [[m:IRC|IRC]] ===
'''Rationale:''' To ease RhinosF1's stress of seeing abuse filter hits by ApexAgunomu. For greater clarity, this is a StreamBotMH command.
 
==== Support ====
# [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 06:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== Proposal 3: Proposal 1 + 2 + two-way interaction ban between ApexAgunomu and RhinosF1 ===
'''Rationale:''' Given the history between ApexAgunomu and RhinosF1, and RhinosF1 leaping to a community ban not supported by [[TestWiki:Policies|official policy]] and not having made ''any'' attempt to modify the [[Special:AbuseFilter/60|abuse filter]] [[User:Chrs|Chrs]] so awesomely created. This would not preclude any other Consul from blocking ApexAgunomu, if required.
 
==== Support ====
 
 
=== Proposal 3: Block ApexAgunomu for 30 days ===
'''Rationale:''' The abuse filter ''may'' have become untenable and the user's [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]] repeated abuse filter hits are continue to demonstrate that they're not making progress required to restore [[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]] and [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]. That being said, the user is making ''very good'' reports on [[m:IRC|IRC]] to the [[m:Counter Vandalism Team|CVT]] team and to Stewards on [https://testwiki.wiki/ Test Wiki], which ''has'' to be taken into consideration. As such, if they can go thirty (30) calendar days from imposition of the block, that alone [[rfc:2119|''should'']] demonstrate enough capacity to warrant disabling of the abuse filter and full restoration of the [[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]] and [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] permissions. As such, if this proposal passes, they are blocked for thirty (30) calendar days and, if they go the full thirty (30) days, ''without'' [[w:WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]], they are unblocked by a Consul and their rights restored.
 
==== Support ====
 
=== Proposal 4: Block ApexAgunomu indefinitely ===
'''Rationale:''' Consensus is consensus, and Dmehus's actions are a [[:w:Project:Supervote]]. It shouldn't be necessary to create an edi filter to stop wide-scale disruption from one person (and much less, the disruption being such a repetitious pattern that automated software is able to detect it).
 
==== Reply by ApexAgunomu ====
I know I have caused a lot of trouble here, and I apologize sincerely for that. However, I would really appreciate it if I could have one last chance to test here. I am not a troll, and I will show that I can obey the rules here.
 
Also, now that I think about it, I'm not sure what exactly I did to warrant an indefinite block. I made some edits that were disruptive, but they were stoped by the filter. And when I tried to edit in other ways that wouldn't set off the filter, I didn't know what exactly I could test without having the admin powers, but I wanted to show that I can test here without triggering the filter. However, that testing of mine led to an indefinite block being proposed and seemingly supported by everyone, which I just don't feel is warranted yet. I thought that since my disruptive actions were being stopped by the filter, there was no harm if I "slipped up". But I see that I need to show that I have actually changed my behavior, by not setting off the filter in the first place. [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 16:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|ApexAgunomu}} What happened is that you used numerous swear words and racial/sexual slurs in a fashion that resembled referring to the community as a whole as those words. When you put "hello fuckers" onto a new page, you're calling the whole community "fuckers", and that, alongside the use of actual slurs (not just benign profanity like "fuck" or "shit") is what the community is taking offense to. —&nbsp;<span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Chrs|Chrs]] ([[User talk:Chrs|talk]])</span> 18:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
::I absolutely don't blame them for being offended. And I guess this whole discussion is the outcome of my whole history here, not just my most recent actions (which to me were the only things leading up to this discussion). [[User:ApexAgunomu|ApexAgunomu]] ([[Special:Contribs/ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:ApexAgunomu|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 19:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 
==== Support ====
# I didn't vote on the original proposal because I am interaction-banned with the user who started it, but I am tired of the constant abuse of wiki resources and what don't even really read like mistakes. I got tired of seeing ApexAgunomu abuse page moves, so I edited the filter to prevent them from moving pages other than [[Move test]]. Just minutes later, I got a notification that a filter I recently edited was activated, and the log showed that it blocked ApexAgunomu from moving [[Change content model test]] to [[TestWiki:Change content model test]] (there have been plenty of other moves like moving one page around to templates, categories, talk pages, and moving people's user pages into article space). If eight people supported the ban, with no-one opposed, I think there's a very clear consensus and closing it as unsuccessful on a technicality is overly bureaucratic and a supervote. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 07:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
# In my opinion, the goings on between the Consuls is irrelevant, because ''Apex refuses to change their behavior.'' Apex has been given more warnings and more second chances than anyone I've ever seen on any wiki project, and ''every time they go right back to trolling.'' It is far past time to stop giving Apex special treatment and just ban them. [[User:Sario528|Sario528]] ([[User talk:Sario528|talk]]) 11:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{Support}} assuming my request for John to review as an independent steward doesn't make this moot anyway. I note for the record as well that I thank Naleksuh for their compliance with the IBAN but I do not feel it precludes them voting in the discussion in anyway. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 11:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
# {{Support}} per above. [[User:MacFan4000|MacFan4000]] <sup>([[User talk:MacFan4000|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/MacFan4000|Contribs]])</sup> 12:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 
=== General comments ===
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
 
== Decrat for Example2 ==
 
Experimented with which direction "back" and "forward" counts as with expiring user groups that can't be changed. Because I had to test this on a group I cannot remove, I used the bureaucrat group. Any consul may now decrat Example2 as test done. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 07:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 
:{{Done}} [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 05:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== [[:mh:meta:Requests_for_Comment/Global_ban_for_ApexAgunomu]] ==
 
[[:mh:meta:Requests_for_Comment/Global_ban_for_ApexAgunomu]] is now in progress - required to notify as one of the wikis that user was involved in [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 07:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== Template displaytitle ==
 
This template currently doesn't exist (it just redlinks). Is there anything we could do about it?
According to [[Special:Undelete]] it was never deleted. In the edit history I can see that this problem goes quite a while back. [[User:Szczot3k|Szczot3k]] ([[User talk:Szczot3k|talk]]) 06:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 
Never mind. Trying to use it via <code><nowiki>{{DISPLAYTITLE|Something}}</nowiki></code> is the reason why. It should be used with <code>:</code> instead of <code>|</code> [[User:Szczot3k|Szczot3k]] ([[User talk:Szczot3k|talk]]) 06:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 
:Never, never mind. I was just using it wrong the whole time.
:Maybe it would be beneficial to at least add a documentation to this template? [[User:Szczot3k|Szczot3k]] ([[User talk:Szczot3k|talk]]) 06:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== Bureaucrats - two different sets of requirements ==
 
TestWiki has inconsistent requirements for bureaucrats. <br>
Per [[TW:RfP]] - one has to be an '''[[TW:A|Administrator]]''' for at least 24 hours, have at least 10 edits, and be "trustworthy". <br>
On the other hand [[TW:B]] states that the user should be an '''[[TestWiki:Users|User]]''' for at least 24 hours, have at least 10 edits an be "trusted by the community". <br>
Being an user, and an administrator on TW are two different things. From what I can see the RfP's "Admin for at least 24h" requirement is the one enforced, but that doesn't mean that technically it's different from TW:B. Being trustworthy, and trusted by the community can also be interpreted twofold. The second one could mean there should be a consensus, and not just one [[TW:C]] judging that. [[User:Szczot3k|Szczot3k]] ([[User talk:Szczot3k|talk]]) 12:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== Using MediaWiki 1.39 ==
 
In general, test wikis run the latest alpha/developer release of MediaWiki, which is currently 1.39. [[User:Cigaryno|Cigaryno]] ([[User talk:Cigaryno|talk]]) 07:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 
:This is for people mostly learning how to use mediawiki. It is not a developer test wiki.
:We have beta which will run 1.39 as soon as it moves to beta.
:Running 1.39 would be impossible currently due to the number of breaking changes, very few extensions actually work. We don't have the resources anyway to deploy a production standard 1.39 server. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 08:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
::1.39 should reach beta/RC in September 2022. [[User:Cigaryno|Cigaryno]] ([[User talk:Cigaryno|talk]]) 16:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
:::I can host a wiki myself running MediaWiki 1.39 to see if there are known issues. [[User:Cigaryno|Cigaryno]] ([[User talk:Cigaryno|talk]]) 15:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 
== Proposal : Demo bot proxy blocking on test wiki ==
(username removed)
Retrieved from "https://publictestwiki.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/47461"