User:Testingthisthing/ArbCom2019: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
#Hawkeye7
#*Former admin who was desysopped for cause. No reason to believe they would be a good arbitrator.
#Kudpung
#*Acts irrationally frequently, is short-tempered and a knee-jerker.
#Maxim
#*Has made some good closes as a bureaucrat.
#Richwales
#*Not familiar with.
#Bradv
#*Does good job although sometimes unable to look at POV from both sides. Part of a clique that regularly gangs up on good faith editors. But I feel he would still be a good arbitrator.
#Casliber
#*Not familiar with. Seen them around and has had positive interactions so I have good impression.
#Calidum
#*Non-admin who has been involved with numerous disputes over the years. Has shown great partisanship, therefore there is no reason to believe he would be a neutral arbitrator.
#Gadfium
#*Not familiar with.
#Thryduulf
#*Has demonstrated incompetence in several areas.
#Enterprisey
#*Rarely gets involved in the administrative side but does good technical work. Not sure if he would be a good arb but typically the quiet ones make the best decisions.
#KrakatoaKatie
#*Outgoing arb who has done a good job thus far.
#Llywrch
#*Not familiar with.
#Newyorkbrad
#*Former arb who's arguably the greatest English Wikipedia arbitrator of all time.
#Xeno
#*A bit of a drama maker and has shown tendentious behavior.
#David Fuchs
#*Not familiar with.
#Beeblebrox
#*Has made good reasonable closes.
#SoWhy
#*A bit rigid and tight on policy but might be a good thing for some balance in the committee.
#Worm That Turned
#*Outgoing arb, has been great.
#Isarra
#*Not familiar with.
#Barkeep49
#*Follower of the letter of law rather than the spirit. Other than that, they've been excellent.
#DGG
#*Former arb if I'm not mistaken, has shown good judgement.
#The Rambling Man
#*Former bureaucrat/admin who has been very noisy in recent years, very vocal in administrative matters and having a terrible block log.
I advocate for the above 11 candidates (with a tick next to their name) to be successful in the elections.
| |||