User:Testingthisthing/ArbCom2019: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5:
#Kudpung
#*Acts irrationally frequently, is short-tempered and a knee-jerker.
#Maxim {{tick}}
#*Has made some good closes as a bureaucrat.
#Richwales
#*Not familiar with.
#Bradv {{tick}}
#*Does good job although sometimes unable to look at POV from both sides. Part of a clique that regularly gangs up on good faith editors. But I feel he would still be a good arbitrator.
#Casliber {{tick}}
#*Not familiar with. Seen them around and has had positive interactions so I have good impression.
#Calidum
Line 19:
#Thryduulf
#*Has demonstrated incompetence in several areas.
#Enterprisey {{tick}}
#*Rarely gets involved in the administrative side but does good technical work. Not sure if he would be a good arb but typically the quiet ones make the best decisions.
#KrakatoaKatie {{tick}}
#*Outgoing arb who has done a good job thus far.
#Llywrch
#*Not familiar with.
#Newyorkbrad {{tick}}
#*Former arb who's arguably the greatest English Wikipedia arbitrator of all time.
#Xeno
Line 31:
#David Fuchs
#*Not familiar with.
#Beeblebrox {{tick}}
#*Has made good reasonable closes.
#SoWhy {{tick}}
#*A bit rigid and tight on policy but might be a good thing for some balance in the committee.
#Worm That Turned {{tick}}
#*Outgoing arb, has been great.
#Isarra
#*Not familiar with.
#Barkeep49 {{tick}}
#*Follower of the letter of law rather than the spirit. Other than that, they've been excellent.
#DGG {{tick}}
#*Former arb if I'm not mistaken, has shown good judgement.
#The Rambling Man
| |||