User talk:Cocopuff2018: Difference between revisions
m
Updating links following global rename using a piped link if and where technically feasible so as to preserve the original username as at the original message posting time.
Cocopuff2018 (talk | contribs) |
m (Updating links following global rename using a piped link if and where technically feasible so as to preserve the original username as at the original message posting time.) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 18:
It is power abuse for a he Did not discuss before demoting he did it without consulting with fellow Collages that is what makes it power abuse. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 13:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
::2 Consuls atleast (myself and puppykun) agree the removal was ok. Appeal denied. Zppix ([[:meta:User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[:meta:CVT|CVT Member]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 13:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
::: Personally, I do not think the removal of crat permissions here was justified at all. Even if the removal of talk page access was 100% wrong, attempts to work with the user or at the very least warnings should have been given. It should never be appropriate to immediately remove permissions upon a single mistake when done in good faith. In addition, the user who was blocked continously removed content after already being told not to once ([[:w:WP:OWNTALK]] does not apply to removing unblock discussions while still blocked), so you could very easily make the argument that the removal of talk page access was justified here. Overall I do not see a reason for crat permissions to be removed at all and would strongly support the restoration of them. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 02:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
i just want to mention i did warn him 2 times to stop removing the conversation as i knew others would reply to it as well, therefore, that is my reason for the removal of his talk page privileges i do agree I was not given any warnings before and i will be emailing John or Southpark to override zppix. zppix please make your case you clearly power abused. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 14:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
:Just for the record {{ping|Cocopuff2018}}, please don't make threats, as that doesn't make the user anymore likely to undemote you. It just aggravates them. You of all people know how that feels. {{User:BrandonWM/signature}} 17:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi everyone i have sent a message to join and will be pausing this matter till John has time to get involved in it thank you for all your help to resolve this matter --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 20:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
:Hi, John does not have local rights here, and stewards cannot interfere with local administration, unless its in violation of a global policy. Zppix ([[:meta:User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[:meta:CVT|CVT Member]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 23:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
== Inactive ==
I am currently inactive within this wiki --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 03:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
| |||