User talk:Cocopuff2018: Difference between revisions
m
→unfair demotion
Line 19:
It is power abuse for a he Did not discuss before demoting he did it without consulting with fellow Collages that is what makes it power abuse. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 13:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
::2 Consuls atleast (myself and puppykun) agree the removal was ok. Appeal denied. Zppix ([[:meta:User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[:meta:CVT|CVT Member]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 13:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
::: Personally, I do not think the removal here was justified at all. Even if the removal of talk page access was 100% wrong, attempts to work with the user or at the very least warnings should have been given. It should never be appropriate to immediately remove permissions upon a single mistake when done in good faith. In addition, the user continously removed content after already being told not to once ([[:w:WP:OWNTALK]] does not apply to removing unblock discussions while still blocked), so you could very easily make the argument that the removal of talk page access was justified. Overall I do not see a reason for it to be removed at all and would strongly support restoration of crat permissions. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 02:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
| |||