TestWiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
|||
Line 546:
:::::::Everyone else, please check his talk page before jumping to conclusions and give him a break. I regret blocking him. [[User:Kiko4564|Kiko4564]] ([[User talk:Kiko4564|talk]]) 07:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
::::::: Void did not remove the restrictions. They removed Kiko4564's block and suggested reducing the restrictions. ''You'' are ignoring the fact that you violated your topic ban and also unblocked yourself, which is a much more important problem. In addition, a consul has already participated in this discussion and proposed a solution to the problem of users unblocking themself, despite Kiko4564 pretending it was completely fine for users to do that as long as they themself believe the block was wrong. And even if they were removed, you still violated them prior to that comment. Trying to excuse the fact that you violated the topic ban and also the fact that the edits were disruptive just reinforces why there was a need for a topic ban to have been made in the first place. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 16:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
:Per our conversation on [[mh:m:IRC|IRC]], I am posting my rationale for using the <code>unblockself</code> permission. I believe the block was wrongly made and poorly justified. I had received messages of support from other crats in the hours before using the permission, and as such I felt comfortable in using it. If I had been alone in believing the block was wrong, I wouldn't have removed it, and instead elected to wait for another member of the community to remove the block. Void had also removed the hard-line restrictions, and as my edits were non-disruptive, there was no need for a block. [[User:BrandonWM|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM|contribs]]) 04:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
| |||