TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Amending Consul policy: Difference between revisions
TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Amending Consul policy (edit)
Revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2023
, 1 year agoclose
(adding my say) |
Reception123 (talk | contribs) (close) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::This RfC is closed as follows:
* Proposal 1: Successful. As this proposal is made specifically in relation to Consuls it supersedes the [[TestWiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]] and introduces a 6 months period for Consuls.
* Proposal 2: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 3: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 4: Unsuccessful.
[[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 19:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
----
Hi everyone,
Line 13 ⟶ 22:
# {{support}} This is something that should have existed originally before now. [[User:Ugochimobi|Ugochimobi]] ([[User talk:Ugochimobi|talk]]) 15:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{support}} I believe this is a good compromise between them being completely exempt from inactivity and having 3 months to work with. 6 months for them should be more than a reasonable amount of time. [[User:Hypercane|Hypercane]] ([[User talk:Hypercane|talk]]) 08:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{support}} [[User:Syunsyunminmin|Syunsyunminmin]] ([[User talk:Syunsyunminmin|talk]]) 17:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{support}} [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 16:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
=== Neutral (1) ===
Line 36 ⟶ 47:
# {{Oppose}} per above --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 20:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per Dmehus, getting Consul here is not such an easy task already. Let's not get ahead of ourselves with this since it isn't needed in my opinion. [[User:Hypercane|Hypercane]] ([[User talk:Hypercane|talk]]) 08:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{oppose}} per above [[User:Syunsyunminmin|Syunsyunminmin]] ([[User talk:Syunsyunminmin|talk]]) 17:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
=== Comments (2) ===
Line 68 ⟶ 80:
# {{Oppose}} per above --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 20:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Oppose}} Per Agent Isai. [[User:Hypercane|Hypercane]] ([[User talk:Hypercane|talk]]) 08:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{oppose}} [[User:Syunsyunminmin|Syunsyunminmin]] ([[User talk:Syunsyunminmin|talk]]) 17:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
=== Comments (4) ===
Line 76 ⟶ 89:
::::"it's about the policy on how it can and cannot be used"
::::Actually, at the top, the non-policy says: "This page describes Steward practices but is not a global policy." [[User:Collei|Collei]] ([[User talk:Collei|talk]]) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
::As someone who was substantially involved in writing the linked page, the basis was codifying unwritten practices that were largely defined by Dmehus, then written/altered by me, and altered again by the current team. It reflects the preference of the Steward group but as stated above is ''not'' a formal policy. It would break nothing if a wiki decided to allow this especially through consensus. Many wikis (most frustratingly reception wikis) in fact had made this tweak in permissions for a long time and self-managed bureaucrats(the problems with that are why it's strongly discouraged and reiterated by the snowball in this section). Stewards take the subject case by case, of course there are default circumstances which the article reflects. Just some background for what the article is on about. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 22:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
| |||