TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Amending Consul policy: Difference between revisions
TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Amending Consul policy (edit)
Revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2023
, 1 year agoclose
(→Comments (4): another comment, spacing is off but I just wanted to leave my 2c in general) |
Reception123 (talk | contribs) (close) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::This RfC is closed as follows:
* Proposal 1: Successful. As this proposal is made specifically in relation to Consuls it supersedes the [[TestWiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]] and introduces a 6 months period for Consuls.
* Proposal 2: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 3: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 4: Unsuccessful.
[[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 19:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
----
Hi everyone,
Line 14 ⟶ 23:
# {{support}} I believe this is a good compromise between them being completely exempt from inactivity and having 3 months to work with. 6 months for them should be more than a reasonable amount of time. [[User:Hypercane|Hypercane]] ([[User talk:Hypercane|talk]]) 08:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{support}} [[User:Syunsyunminmin|Syunsyunminmin]] ([[User talk:Syunsyunminmin|talk]]) 17:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{support}} [[User:Sakura emad|🌸 Sakura emad 💖]] ([[User talk:Sakura emad|talk]]) 16:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
=== Neutral (1) ===
Line 80 ⟶ 90:
::::Actually, at the top, the non-policy says: "This page describes Steward practices but is not a global policy." [[User:Collei|Collei]] ([[User talk:Collei|talk]]) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
::As someone who was substantially involved in writing the linked page, the basis was codifying unwritten practices that were largely defined by Dmehus, then written/altered by me, and altered again by the current team. It reflects the preference of the Steward group but as stated above is ''not'' a formal policy. It would break nothing if a wiki decided to allow this especially through consensus. Many wikis (most frustratingly reception wikis) in fact had made this tweak in permissions for a long time and self-managed bureaucrats(the problems with that are why it's strongly discouraged and reiterated by the snowball in this section). Stewards take the subject case by case, of course there are default circumstances which the article reflects. Just some background for what the article is on about. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 22:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>
| |||