TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Amending Consul policy: Difference between revisions

close
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
(close)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::This RfC is closed as follows:
* Proposal 1: Successful. As this proposal is made specifically in relation to Consuls it supersedes the [[TestWiki:Inactivity|inactivity policy]] and introduces a 6 months period for Consuls.
* Proposal 2: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 3: Unsuccessful.
* Proposal 4: Unsuccessful.
[[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 19:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
----
Hi everyone,
 
I’d like to propose a series of changes to the TestWiki Consuls Policy. <i>Please note that no proposal in this Request for Comment is mutually exclusive to another.</i> [[User:BrandonWM|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM|contribs]]) 02:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 
== Proposal 1 ==
Add a revocation criteria that states that if the user has been inactive for a period of 6 months or more (log actions, edits, any contributions to TestWiki in any manner), their rights will be removed. They of course, can request admin or bureaucrat at [[TW:RfP]] at any time, or consul here. [[User:BrandonWM|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM|contribs]]) 02:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Line 77 ⟶ 90:
::::Actually, at the top, the non-policy says: "This page describes Steward practices but is not a global policy." [[User:Collei|Collei]] ([[User talk:Collei|talk]]) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
::As someone who was substantially involved in writing the linked page, the basis was codifying unwritten practices that were largely defined by Dmehus, then written/altered by me, and altered again by the current team. It reflects the preference of the Steward group but as stated above is ''not'' a formal policy. It would break nothing if a wiki decided to allow this especially through consensus. Many wikis (most frustratingly reception wikis) in fact had made this tweak in permissions for a long time and self-managed bureaucrats(the problems with that are why it's strongly discouraged and reiterated by the snowball in this section). Stewards take the subject case by case, of course there are default circumstances which the article reflects. Just some background for what the article is on about. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 22:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>