TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Establishing an RfC process on TestWiki: Difference between revisions

# {{Oppose}} TestWiki is a project with a limited purpose: to allow users to test out different MediaWiki tools and functions. Some minimal policy to ensure that the project isn't abused and is used fairly have to exist but I simply can't imagine what other policies would ever be necessary on TestWiki even if it grows since its purpose is so straightforward. I don't think RfCs are at all necessary on a project such as TestWiki and that if by any chance there's a policy proposal every once in a while (which as I explain above I think would be rare) it can be done via Community Portal. I also agree that it adds unnecessary bureaucracy to a small project that isn't in need of such a process, unlike Meta. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 19:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

# {{oppose}} I don't feel strongly about this although I think it would be another step to my wider issue with testwiki: overly bureaucratic. I wouldn't suggest people use this wiki already for that reason and this would be another step down the road as there's not much reason to introduce yet another 'mechanism' that isn't functionally necessary. Also, Ugo's oppose sounds a lot like an oppose by proxy to me. Finally the nature of these discussions very much puts the cart before the horse (doing an rfc about having an rfc page on a page that isn't yet validated) and imo is an overstep. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

 

=== Comments (2) ===