User talk:Zppix: Difference between revisions
→Bureaucrat: new section
m (Updating links following global rename using a piped link if and where technically feasible so as to preserve the original username as at the original message posting time.) |
(→Bureaucrat: new section) |
||
Line 15:
Hi Zppix, when approving requests for RfP, please do your best to use <nowiki>{{AdminAcceptRfP}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{BureaucratAcceptRfP}}</nowiki>. These templates are on the wiki for a reason, so could you please do your best to use them when approving requests? Thanks! {{User:BrandonWM/signature}} 21:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|BlackWidowMovie0}} I realize your note to {{ping|Zppix}} regarding {{tl|AdminAcceptRfP}} and {{tl|BureaucratAcceptRfP}} was made in [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], but I would just note that they are completely optional and not required to be used when granting rights. I personally find them useful, mainly since they use the typical wording of my replies, but I ''do'' suspect most bureaucrats and consuls probably will not use them. Hope that helps. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
== Bureaucrat ==
I actually extended it because you tell me that in 72 hour if I don't do anything wrong you will extend it but none was extending it so I did it. [[User:Nexovia|Nexovia]] ([[User talk:Nexovia|talk]]) 07:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
| |||