Template:High-use: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

11 April 2024

30 May 2023

21 March 2022

11 August 2020

22 June 2020

2 December 2019

16 August 2019

9 May 2019

14 October 2018

13 October 2018

12 October 2018

13 May 2018

12 May 2018

5 May 2018

30 April 2017

2 December 2016

1 December 2016

23 November 2016

22 November 2016

21 November 2016

20 November 2016

18 November 2016

16 November 2016

9 June 2016

13 February 2016

2 February 2016

17 January 2016

12 January 2016

14 December 2015

26 June 2015

23 April 2015

13 April 2015

17 August 2014

13 June 2014

25 April 2014

6 April 2014

5 April 2014

4 April 2014

1 January 2014

28 May 2011

14 November 2010

12 November 2010

11 November 2010

6 February 2010

6 November 2009

7 June 2009

15 May 2009

14 April 2009

14 February 2009

  • curprev 13:4313:43, 14 February 2009TestWiki>Davidgothberg 906 bytes +179 Making it so the /sandbox, /testcases and talk page links are correct also when this template is seen on the /doc page (and on a talkpage). Thus no need to use includeonly when using this template. undo

12 February 2009

11 February 2009

  • curprev 22:3822:38, 11 February 2009TestWiki>Davidgothberg 707 bytes −79 Reverting to the excellent softer wording that Thumperward used in his previous edit, since the old stronger wording now is split out to {{high-risk}}. And changing to yellow minor warning style. undo

26 November 2008

19 November 2008

5 October 2008

21 July 2008

20 June 2008

  • curprev 10:1410:14, 20 June 2008TestWiki>Davidgothberg 700 bytes 0 Titoxd: First sentence works as a title, so doesn't need a period. But if it has a period then I think it should be bold like the rest of the "title", thus moving the period inside the bold markup. undo

19 June 2008

17 June 2008

16 June 2008

31 May 2008

  • curprev 10:5610:56, 31 May 2008TestWiki>Davidgothberg 790 bytes +175 Reverted edits by Gurchzilla to last version by David (me). No, {{ombox}} is not ready for use. And you broke several things, the if-statement is needed so the first parameter can be empty. undo

30 May 2008

19 May 2008

13 May 2008