TestWiki:Requests for Comment/Establishing an RfC process on TestWiki: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Sakura emad (talk | contribs) (→Support (5): s) |
Reception123 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
# {{Oppose}} I am not exactly planning on voting on the rest of this RfC, but to me this proposal seems pointless, I would have preferred if this was kept on the community portal, and the fact that an RfC was created using the proposed policy about said policy makes this even more pointless and I completely oppose that idea due to the fact it had not yet been determined (hence this proposal) when this RfC was created using this new proposal, practically forcing it with no choice. [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]] ([[User talk:Universal Omega|talk]]) 00:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
# {{Oppose}} I am not exactly planning on voting on the rest of this RfC, but to me this proposal seems pointless, I would have preferred if this was kept on the community portal, and the fact that an RfC was created using the proposed policy about said policy makes this even more pointless and I completely oppose that idea due to the fact it had not yet been determined (hence this proposal) when this RfC was created using this new proposal, practically forcing it with no choice. [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]] ([[User talk:Universal Omega|talk]]) 00:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
#: The fact that other RfCs were already moved to the subpages as well makes me {{oppose}} this even stronger. It shows that this proposal had no need to even exist if it is being done anyway, and shows a blatant disregard for this RfC proposal in the first place since it hadn't even been closed yet. [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]] ([[User talk:Universal Omega|talk]]) 08:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
#: The fact that other RfCs were already moved to the subpages as well makes me {{oppose}} this even stronger. It shows that this proposal had no need to even exist if it is being done anyway, and shows a blatant disregard for this RfC proposal in the first place since it hadn't even been closed yet. [[User:Universal Omega|Universal Omega]] ([[User talk:Universal Omega|talk]]) 08:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
# {{Oppose}} TestWiki is a project with a limited purpose: to allow users to test out different MediaWiki tools and functions. Some minimal policy to ensure that the project isn't abused and is used fairly have to exist but I simply can't imagine what other policies would ever be necessary on TestWiki even if it grows since its purpose is so straightforward. I don't think RfCs are at all necessary on a project such as TestWiki and that if by any chance there's a policy proposal every once in a while (which as I explain above I think would be rare) it can be done via Community Portal. I also agree that it adds unnecessary bureaucracy to a small project that isn't in need of such a process, unlike Meta. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 19:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
=== Comments (2) === |
=== Comments (2) === |
||