TestWiki talk:Inactivity/Exceptions: Difference between revisions

Add topic
Content added Content deleted
Line 20: Line 20:
Possible request for inactivity exemptions - does it apply to bot's? [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 21:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible request for inactivity exemptions - does it apply to bot's? [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 21:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
:It's only given where there is a need or strong grounds. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 11:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
:It's only given where there is a need or strong grounds. [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] ([[User talk:RhinosF1|talk]]) 11:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

== Inactivity exemptions for consuls ==

Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it ''more'' important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)