TestWiki talk:Inactivity/Exceptions: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:06, 24 November 2020 (edit) MirahezeGDPR a51581232c7cc84ec1a32c40d8489548 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Inactivity exemptions for consuls: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:09, 25 November 2020 (edit) (undo) MirahezeGDPR 4ce229fc9687e12ad2ff96f863f0909e (talk \| contribs) (→‎Inactivity exemptions for consuls: Reply) Tag: Reply Newer edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it ''more'' important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. [[User:Naleksuh\|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh\|talk]]) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)		Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it ''more'' important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. [[User:Naleksuh\|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh\|talk]]) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

			:Good thinking, and I '''support'''. However, perhaps this should be discussed on a more high traffic page, such as [[TestWiki:Community portal\|the community portal]]. [[User:Justarandomliberal\|Justarandomliberal]] ([[User talk:Justarandomliberal\|talk]]) 01:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)