User talk:BrandonWM: Difference between revisions

	edit
Archives
	Archive One (2022) - Archive Two (2023) - Archive Three (2024)

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:43, 30 April 2024

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere. And again, please do not delete discussions of my talk page, it is my own decision. Thanks!

Congratulations[edit]

Latest comment: 15 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Greetings BrandomWM, congrats on being elected as a consul and I hope you prove your worthiness :) Harvici (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 '''Attention:''' I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—''my talk page''—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if ''I'' leave a comment on ''your talk page'', please respond to it ''there''. Remember, we can use our [[special:watchlist|watchlist]] to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere. And again, please do not delete discussions of my talk page, it is my own decision. <!-----Per WP:OWNTALK-----> Thanks!</div>
-{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive One (2022)]] - [[/Archive 2|Archive Two (2023)]]}}
+{{Archive box|[[/Archive 1|Archive One (2022)]] - [[/Archive 2|Archive Two (2023)]] - [[/Archive 3|Archive Three (2024)]]}}
+== Congratulations ==
-== "RfCs should not be closed by anyone other than functionaries unless there is a technical reason to do so, ie. already being implemented or cannot be implemented" ==
+Greetings BrandomWM, congrats on being elected as a consul and I hope you prove your worthiness :) [[User:Harvici|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#CC4E5C ; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Harvici</span>]] ([[User talk:Harvici|<span style="color:#228B22">''talk''</span>]]) 15:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
-This is not documented anywhere. There has never been any such consensus and in fact people would likely be opposed to that as unnecessary bureaucracy, as is currently the case for Agent Isai's RFC proposal. In addition, "functionaries" refers to CheckUsers, Oversighters, and Stewards. This wiki has no local CheckUsers and Oversighters and Stewards generally stay out of local affairs unless need be. I really don't think you meant to say that no-one here, not even consuls, can close RFCs, so if you would like to clarify what you meant, now you can do so, though I will note that there is no policy on who can and cannot close RFCs, though I disagree with their closure in general so I haven't reverted your edit. So far, no consul has closed it and if this continues for a while I likely will. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 02:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
-:Well, this conversation seems to have been partially had on Discord/IRC, but I'll note what happened for record-keeping purposes. Functionaries are users authorized to carry out serious actions on a wiki, including blocking and making administrative decisions, ie. Meta sysops/bureaucrats and TestWiki consuls. As Void, Raidarr, and myself have now stated. I'm not sure why you feel the need to continue pressing a concept which has been debunked by countless users. In addition, you keep on pushing a narrative that is solely your own, without cause. If you want to have this objectively stupid discussion, sure. But your position has continuously been proven wrong by many users, and I'm not sure why you feel the need to continue. [[User:BrandonWM|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM|contribs]]) 03:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
-:: You don't seem to have addressed the purpose of this message at all. The issue is that there is no restriction on who can close an RfC, and for you to simply enact one does not make sense. There is no such rule, and I would not call it a "convention" either given that proposals on Community portal have been closed by anyone, and that consensus is against this RFC process. I am worried about using the functionary nomenclature to distract from this. Furthermore, even if it was a convention, that doesn't mean you should revert any closes by non-functionaries. As user Void [https://meta.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=249158&diffmode=source once said], {{tq|An unwritten convention does not constitute policy. }}, though unfortunately you seem to be using their name to claim support for yourself. Please don't enact rules in this way, especially in obvious, clear-cut cases where conventions would apply even less. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 03:30, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
-:::It's convention? Again, as Raidarr stated in the conversation we ''just'' had, it's followed on a great number of wikis. You seem to want to pick and choose which conventions to follow and not follow. As was said before, just because it's not policy not to edit others' userpages, doesn't mean you should. The same applies here. The user in question shouldn't have judged consensus and then closed the RfC unilaterally, and multiple users agree with me, as has been seen in the Discord channel.
-:::I'm not enacting rules at all. I'm simply re-iterating what has already been deemed convention, and reverting a close. [[User:BrandonWM|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM|contribs]]) 03:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)