User talk:BrandonWM: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:42, 16 March 2023 edit MirahezeGDPR a51581232c7cc84ec1a32c40d8489548 (talk \| contribs) 564 edits →‎"RfCs should not be closed by anyone other than functionaries unless there is a technical reason to do so, ie. already being implemented or cannot be implemented": new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:19, 16 March 2023 edit undo BrandonWM (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Consuls, Administrators 410 edits →‎"RfCs should not be closed by anyone other than functionaries unless there is a technical reason to do so, ie. already being implemented or cannot be implemented": Reply Tag: Reply Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	This is not documented anywhere. There has never been any such consensus and in fact people would likely be opposed to that as unnecessary bureaucracy, as is currently the case for Agent Isai's RFC proposal. In addition, "functionaries" refers to CheckUsers, Oversighters, and Stewards. This wiki has no local CheckUsers and Oversighters and Stewards generally stay out of local affairs unless need be. I really don't think you meant to say that no-one here, not even consuls, can close RFCs, so if you would like to clarify what you meant, now you can do so, though I will note that there is no policy on who can and cannot close RFCs, though I disagree with their closure in general so I haven't reverted your edit. So far, no consul has closed it and if this continues for a while I likely will. [[User:Naleksuh\|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh\|talk]]) 02:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)		This is not documented anywhere. There has never been any such consensus and in fact people would likely be opposed to that as unnecessary bureaucracy, as is currently the case for Agent Isai's RFC proposal. In addition, "functionaries" refers to CheckUsers, Oversighters, and Stewards. This wiki has no local CheckUsers and Oversighters and Stewards generally stay out of local affairs unless need be. I really don't think you meant to say that no-one here, not even consuls, can close RFCs, so if you would like to clarify what you meant, now you can do so, though I will note that there is no policy on who can and cannot close RFCs, though I disagree with their closure in general so I haven't reverted your edit. So far, no consul has closed it and if this continues for a while I likely will. [[User:Naleksuh\|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh\|talk]]) 02:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

			:Well, this conversation seems to have been partially had on Discord/IRC, but I'll note what happened for record-keeping purposes. Functionaries are users authorized to carry out serious actions on a wiki, including blocking and making administrative decisions, ie. Meta sysops/bureaucrats and TestWiki consuls. As Void, Raidarr, and myself have now stated. I'm not sure why you feel the need to continue pressing a concept which has been debunked by countless users. In addition, you keep on pushing a narrative that is solely your own, without cause. If you want to have this objectively stupid discussion, sure. But your position has continuously been proven wrong by many users, and I'm not sure why you feel the need to continue. [[User:BrandonWM\|BrandonWM]] ([[User talk:BrandonWM\|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/BrandonWM\|contribs]]) 03:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)