User talk:Omni Flames: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Omni Flames in topic Testing blocks
Content added Content deleted
Reception123 (talk | contribs) (→Testing blocks: new section) |
Omni Flames (talk | contribs) (→Testing blocks: re) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Hi, when you test blocks please use an appropriate description like "test", instead of using "Spambot" which would be used for a serious block. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 07:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC) |
Hi, when you test blocks please use an appropriate description like "test", instead of using "Spambot" which would be used for a serious block. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 07:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Ah, okay sure. I just wanted to test what would happen if I selected one of the dropdown items, I won't do that again, sorry. [[User:Omni Flames|Omni Flames]] ([[User talk:Omni Flames|talk]]) 07:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:52, 3 July 2016
Revert your tests
Please remember to revert your tests. Thanks, -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 18:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, will do... Omni Flames (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Discussion pages
Hello there,
Discussion pages aren't a place for tests! :)
SleepyMode (talk) 09:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi SleepyMode, as you can see above NDKilla has already told the user. Reception123 (talk) 09:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for 5 minutes because I felt like it. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- @ThePlatypusofDoom: Why, thank you! Omni Flames (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Testing blocks
Hi, when you test blocks please use an appropriate description like "test", instead of using "Spambot" which would be used for a serious block. Reception123 (talk) 07:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, okay sure. I just wanted to test what would happen if I selected one of the dropdown items, I won't do that again, sorry. Omni Flames (talk) 07:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)