User talk:Primeferac

	edit
Archives
	Archive 1

Abuse filter

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What will happen if I change these &(and) to |(or) in filter No.21? What's the differences? --Tiger (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Primeferac (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

Request reason:

Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @Reception123: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. Primeferac (talk) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @[[:User:Reception123|Reception123]]: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. [[User:Primeferac|Primeferac]] ([[User talk:Primeferac|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | 3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @[[:User:Reception123|Reception123]]: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. [[User:Primeferac|Primeferac]] ([[User talk:Primeferac|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @[[:User:Reception123|Reception123]]: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. [[User:Primeferac|Primeferac]] ([[User talk:Primeferac|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I don't understand why Test page is a "Permanent redirect" and need to be protected indefinitly.--Tiger (talk) 03:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]