User talk:Test user: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From TestWiki
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Void
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Blocked: new section)
(dec)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock reviewed|1=This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism.|decline=There are some things that fall well outside any reasonable definition of testing. <span style="text-shadow:7px 5px 7px grey;font-family:High Tower Text">-- [[User:Void|<span style="color:#123524">Void</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Void|<span style="color:#353839">''Whispers''</span>]]</sup></span> 15:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)}}
== Blocking ==
Hello, I've noticed that you have blocked a large number of IP addresses for an indefinite duration without reason. Please be aware first and foremost that [[TestWiki:Testing policy#Blocking users|this is a testwiki and that all blocks should be for testing]]. This means that they should be for a short duration and be removed within two hours of their placement. Otherwise, blocks '''require''' a very good reason for being placed. Also, as a rule of thumb, IPs should almost never be blocked indefinitely as they can change for the user, resulting in collateral damage. Please be aware that if you continue to block IPs/users without good reason beyond the purpose of testing, your rights may be revoked. <span style="text-shadow:7px 5px 7px grey;font-family:High Tower Text">-- [[User:Void|<span style="color:#123524">Void</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Void|<span style="color:#353839">''Whispers''</span>]]</sup></span> 13:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


== Username ==
== Impersonation ==


Hi. Please note that your current username (which contains your IP as well) is misleading, and I don't think should be used. Please therefore [[M:Stewards' noticeboard|request a rename]] as soon as possible to avoid any further confusion. There are a lot of possibilities for usernames out there, and I don't think it's that hard to choose one. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 14:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Please note that I do not appreciate the creation of [https://test.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D0%AF%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D1%96%D0%BE%D0%BF123 this account] and it can be considered as an "impersonation". Please refrain from doing such things out of common sense. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 16:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I've removed your sysop flag and blocked you for a period of 6 months for disruption of the project. You have ignored my request that you change your username, you've blocked me while I was unblocking the IPs that you blocked before and you removed my talkpage. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 14:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:50, 2 August 2017

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Test user (block logactive blockscentral auth (for registered users)global blocks (for IP users)contribsdeleted contribschange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism.

Decline reason:

There are some things that fall well outside any reasonable definition of testing. -- Void Whispers 15:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Impersonation[edit]

Please note that I do not appreciate the creation of this account and it can be considered as an "impersonation". Please refrain from doing such things out of common sense. Reception123 (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]