User talk:Test user

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Test user (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism. | 3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism. | decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed | 1=This is the public test wiki, so users should be still able to unblock themselves after vandalism. | accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Impersonation

Please note that I do not appreciate the creation of this account and it can be considered as an "impersonation". Please refrain from doing such things out of common sense. Reception123 (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)