Jump to content

User talk:Redmin: Difference between revisions

Add topic
m
(Created page with "== Protecting interface messages in MediaWiki namespace == Hi R4356th, While I ''can'' see your rationale for protecting Special:AllMessages|interfa...")
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 2:
Hi R4356th,
 
While I ''can'' see your rationale for protecting [[Special:AllMessages|interface messages]], as you did with wanting to protect [[MediaWiki:Edittools]] at [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] level of protection in this [[Special:Redirect/logid/14008|log action]], I ''do'' disagree with it, personally and philosophically, as this is, ultimately, a test wiki, with active consuls, bureaucrats, or even administrators, for that matter, wherewith the technical ability to <code>rollback</code> or <code>undo</code> edits that are problematic in some way. This is where good [[w:WP:COMMONSENSE|common sense]] comes in terms for test administrators and mostly test bureaucrats. As such, I have [[Special:Redirect/logid/14009|reverted]] this protection for the following reasons, namely that:
# If you felt protection at <code>[[TestWiki:Consuls|consul]]</code> was warranted, then you should've reached out to any Consul via their locally user talk page, ideally, with your reason(s) why for them to effect. Protecting a page at <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> when you feel <code>consul</code> protection is warranted doesn't make sense, and wouldn't be appropriate; and, perhaps more importantly,
# This is after all a test wiki, so other than some CSS/JS files in MediaWiki namespace, protection isn't needed on most interface messages, as we have active consuls, bureaucrats, or even administrators, for that matter, where edits are problematic in some way.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.