TestWiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
→Closure of consul vote with no input...: Reply
NotAracham (talk | contribs) |
NotAracham (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 299:
:::::--[[User:NotAracham|NotAracham]] ([[User talk:NotAracham|talk]]) 14:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
:[[User:NotAracham|NotAracham]], thank you for your question. The discussion was open for a week. If I had concerns about the nominee, I would not have closed and would have expressed a view. I did take care into ensuring it was compliant with the current [[TestWiki:Policies|policies]] and, in particular, in terms of precedents, I followed [[TestWiki:Community portal/Archive 2#Request for Consul by Zppix|this Consul request]], which Void closed as successful. As with this request, it, too, had only a single participant other than the nominee. Even in my close, I even borrowed and varied Void's wording. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 13:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
::Thanks for taking the time to reply, Doug. I would note that in the case you reference, the request was held open for the better part of 2.5 months before closure, though is otherwise essentially on-par.
::Testwiki's understandably an odd one since folks aren't (for the most part) daily users, hopefully we can come up with some better ways to get community engagement on consequential RfConsulships that reflect the intent of 'community consensus' going forward.
::--[[User:NotAracham|NotAracham]] ([[User talk:NotAracham|talk]]) 14:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
| |||