User talk:Cocopuff2018: Difference between revisions

From TestWiki
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pup in topic unfair demotion
Content added Content deleted
m (→‎unfair demotion: You are not a Consul)
(→‎unfair demotion: Pup is a verified alt of NDKilla)
Line 14: Line 14:
: And theres no policy against removing messages from his talk. Therefore you abuse block. Zppix ([[:meta:User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[:meta:CVT|CVT Member]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
: And theres no policy against removing messages from his talk. Therefore you abuse block. Zppix ([[:meta:User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[:meta:CVT|CVT Member]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
:: No, all I did was revoked his talk privileges that is no abuse, ya know I am gonna report you to john lewis and SPF I am tired of your power abuse and plus it was a block discussion he does not need to remove, demoted me without discussion with fellow colleagues. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 22:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
:: No, all I did was revoked his talk privileges that is no abuse, ya know I am gonna report you to john lewis and SPF I am tired of your power abuse and plus it was a block discussion he does not need to remove, demoted me without discussion with fellow colleagues. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 22:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
::: <s>(Note from another Consul)</s> I'd just like to point out that it was a valid demotion. You abused local sysop in contravention of the [[TestWiki:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] to basically solve an edit war you were involved with. This was inappropriate and I see no reason to call it an unfair demotion. [[User:Pup|Pup]] ([[User talk:Pup|talk]]) 00:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
::: (Note from another Consul) I'd just like to point out that it was a valid demotion. You abused local sysop in contravention of the [[TestWiki:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]] to basically solve an edit war you were involved with. This was inappropriate and I see no reason to call it an unfair demotion. [[User:Pup|Pup]] ([[User talk:Pup|talk]]) 00:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:39, 30 October 2020

Test --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 03:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

test

test 1234

Another test

test page 1234 --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

unfair demotion

i told black widow to stop removing the conversation as it was legit unnecessary and he did not listen so then he did it again and zppix demoted me unfairly i would like to discuss this and please help me someone? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And theres no policy against removing messages from his talk. Therefore you abuse block. Zppix (Meta | CVT Member | talk to me) 22:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, all I did was revoked his talk privileges that is no abuse, ya know I am gonna report you to john lewis and SPF I am tired of your power abuse and plus it was a block discussion he does not need to remove, demoted me without discussion with fellow colleagues. --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(Note from another Consul) I'd just like to point out that it was a valid demotion. You abused local sysop in contravention of the Blocking policy to basically solve an edit war you were involved with. This was inappropriate and I see no reason to call it an unfair demotion. Pup (talk) 00:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]