User talk:Primeferac: Difference between revisions

From TestWiki
Latest comment: 7 years ago by PokestarFan in topic Unblock
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(As not every admin has the evidence that you are a sockpuppet, I moved it to blocker.)
Line 7: Line 7:
== Unblock ==
== Unblock ==


{{unblock|reason=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by {{ping|Reception123}} to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. [[User:Primeferac|Primeferac]] ([[User talk:Primeferac|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)}}
{{Unblock on hold | 1=Reception123| 2=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by <span class="template-ping">@[[:User:Reception123|Reception123]]:</span> to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. [[User:Primeferac|Primeferac]] ([[User talk:Primeferac|talk]]) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC) | 3 = [[User:PokestarFan|PokestarFan]] ([[User talk:PokestarFan|talk]]) 22:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)}}
:As not every admin has the evidence that you are a sockpuppet, I moved it to blocker. [[User:PokestarFan|PokestarFan]] ([[User talk:PokestarFan|talk]]) 22:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


I don't understand why [[Test page]] is a "Permanent redirect" and need to be protected indefinitly.--[[User:Tiger|Tiger]] ([[User talk:Tiger|talk]]) 03:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand why [[Test page]] is a "Permanent redirect" and need to be protected indefinitly.--[[User:Tiger|Tiger]] ([[User talk:Tiger|talk]]) 03:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 2 April 2017

Archive
Archives
Archive 1

Abuse filter

What will happen if I change these &(and) to |(or) in filter No.21? What's the differences? --Tiger (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Primeferac (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Blocking administrator: Reception123 (talk)

Reviewing administrator: PokestarFan (talk) 22:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request reason:

Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @Reception123: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. Primeferac (talk) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @Reception123: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. Primeferac (talk) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}Reply[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=Have I been blocked just because I triggered the LTA abuse filter? I hit the filter twice trying to say the word "cra(p)" in good faith, not realizing that it was blocked. That word is not a swear and I request that my account be unblocked. I respect the decision by @Reception123: to decline bureaucrat access, although I don't see how any of my actions were "extreme". Please clarify more. Primeferac (talk) 14:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}Reply[reply]
As not every admin has the evidence that you are a sockpuppet, I moved it to blocker. PokestarFan (talk) 22:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't understand why Test page is a "Permanent redirect" and need to be protected indefinitly.--Tiger (talk) 03:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]