TestWiki talk:Inactivity/Exceptions: Difference between revisions
(→Inactivity exemptions for consuls: new section) |
(→Inactivity exemptions for consuls: Reply) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it ''more'' important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it ''more'' important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Good thinking, and I '''support'''. However, perhaps this should be discussed on a more high traffic page, such as [[TestWiki:Community portal|the community portal]]. [[User:Justarandomliberal|Justarandomliberal]] ([[User talk:Justarandomliberal|talk]]) 01:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:09, 25 November 2020
I'm still there?
I should be removed now... :3 SleepyMode (talk) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Why you are remove, when you are still here?
AYST201 (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- This is only for exceptions which need to have a good reason. Not any user gets on this list. Reception123 (talk) 13:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Reception123: Can you put me to the list for infinity:) TriX (talk) 04:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- @TriX: As you are active anyway, I see no need of putting you on the list for the moment, as you need to be inactive for 6 months for your permissions to be removed. Reception123 (talk) 19:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oh. okay if you say toTriX (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
ZppixBot renaming to MirahezeBots
@RhinosF1:, when you get a chance, can you also update this page link to MirahezeBots instead of ZppixBot now that @Void: has completed the global rename? Also, do global renamings not happen instantly? I saw Void rename ZppixBot on Meta and other wikis yesterday, but this renaming is occurring only today?
Cheers,
Dmehus (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- @RhinosF1: @Void: took care of the update to TestWiki:Inactivity/Exceptions. Dmehus (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible request for inactivity exemptions - does it apply to bot's? Naleksuh (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's only given where there is a need or strong grounds. RhinosF1 (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Inactivity exemptions for consuls
Is it a good idea to grant inactivity exemptions solely due to being a consul and nothing else? I don't see why simply being a consul should result in an exemption. In addition, the inactivity policy describes itself as being "for mostly security reasons", which arguably makes it more important to remove inactive consuls than inactive sysops/bureaucrats. Naleksuh (talk) 05:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Good thinking, and I support. However, perhaps this should be discussed on a more high traffic page, such as the community portal. Justarandomliberal (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)