Topic on User talk:Dmehus
- (cur prev topic) 23:36, 23 January 2022 . . Doug (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (Their edits to CSS/JS pages on TestWiki may be limited, but they have edited similar pages on other Miraheze wikis. Additionally, per the...) . . +505
- (cur prev topic) 23:32, 23 January 2022 . . Doug (talk | contribs) edited a post on "Interface admin" . . −16
- (cur prev topic) 23:31, 23 January 2022 . . MirahezeGDPR a51581232c7cc84ec1a32c40d8489548 (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (I don't see any evidence of trust. In particular, the user claims they have "made some edits to interface admin protected pages in the pa...) . . +267
- (cur prev topic) 23:29, 23 January 2022 . . Doug (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (No problem, done. I can understand your frustration, and was a bit puzzled why Naleksuh declined your request, since bureaucrats have no...) . . +818
- (cur prev topic) 23:10, 23 January 2022 . . Synoman Barris (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (Thank you. If you don't mind you can also return my +crat and + admin bits. I was a bit frustrated earlier and I ended up removing both....) . . +144
- (cur prev topic) 22:52, 23 January 2022 . . Doug (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (Synoman Barris, though your request rationale could've been a bit clearer, you've shown yourself to be a trusted user, have confirmed you...) . . +472
- (cur prev topic) 07:28, 23 January 2022 . . Synoman Barris (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (No problem then. Consider this request withdrawn) . . +48
- (cur prev topic) 07:03, 23 January 2022 . . MirahezeGDPR a51581232c7cc84ec1a32c40d8489548 (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (It was locked to consuls for a reason. You have made one edit to CSS pages, which was reverted.) . . +95
- (cur prev topic) 06:57, 23 January 2022 . . Synoman Barris (talk | contribs) commented on "Interface admin" (Hello Dmehus, hope your doing well. I made a rerequest for interface admin over at Rfp which was declined by a test user citing "trust is...) . . +330