TestWiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From TestWiki
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mazzaz in topic Wordmark
Content added Content deleted
(+ Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-06-24)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
m (Human: Archiving 12 thread(s) (older than 60 days) to Archive 3)
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 3: Line 3:
<br />
<br />
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
__NEWSECTIONLINK__


== Favicon ==

Should the favicon of this wiki be the same as the logo instead of the regular miraheze favicon? [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 02:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|Naleksuh}} It probably should be. Do you happen to know the dimensions of a favicon, so I can resize the image, upload, and set in ManageWiki? [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 03:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Dmehus}} That's not necessary, just take the same url being used for the logo and use that for the favicon. I did that for dev wiki and it worked out fine. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 04:50, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Naleksuh}} Ah, I wasn't sure if the favicon would automatically resize, as I know the site logo has to be an exact 135x135 (or 135x''x'' or ''x''x135), so I'll try and make this change now then. Thanks for the good suggestion! [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Naleksuh}} This seems to be {{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/13537|done]]}} now. Thanks again. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 15:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::For me the Miraheze logo is still the fav icon. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 15:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
::::::{{Ping|PorkchopGMX}} That is very strange and shouldn't be happening. Have you tried reloading your cache for publictestwiki.com? [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] ([[User talk:Reception123|talk]]) 15:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::::I completely forgot about this, but the correct fav icon is showing up now. [[User:PorkchopGMX|PorkchopGMX]] ([[User talk:PorkchopGMX|talk]]) 13:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
::::::::Oh, okay, that's great. :) [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 19:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

== Inactive Rights Removal - 2020-12-21 ==

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2020-11-{{#expr: 21+7}}''' if they do not return to activity:
*<s>{{RFP/User|Applemasterexpert}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/33830|active]]
*{{RFP/User|CircleyDoesExtracter}}
*{{RFP/User|Huawei251}}
*{{RFP/User|MarioSuperstar77}}
*{{RFP/User|QueerEcofeminist}}
*{{RFP/User|SA 13 Bro}}
*{{RFP/User|Wikitext}}
*{{RFP/User|デーモン閣下}}
Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:01:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{Done|Rights removed from seven (7) users}}. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 01:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-01-19 ==

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-01-{{#expr: 19+7}}''' if they do not return to activity:
*{{RFP/User|Dano}}
*{{RFP/User|Helper}}
*{{RFP/User|Killarnee}}
*{{RFP/User|Lois}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|MacFan4000}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/34199|active]]
*{{RFP/User|MusikAnimal}}
*{{RFP/User|Sardine123}}
*{{RFP/User|Seemplez}}
*{{RFP/User|Synoman Barris}}
*{{RFP/User|Whitetiger0423}}
*{{RFP/User|Wikiwater2020}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|开炸弹车}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/34133|active]]

Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:16:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
::{{Done|Rights removed from ten (10) users}}. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-02-15 ==

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-02-{{#expr: 15+7}}''' if they do not return to activity:
*{{RFP/User|A2093064}}
*{{RFP/User|Ans}}
*{{RFP/User|BlueFox}}
*{{RFP/User|Cactus755}}
*{{RFP/User|Fizz fam}}
*{{RFP/User|ImprovedWikiImprovment}}
*{{RFP/User|Random77}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|Scian}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/34525|active]]
*{{RFP/User|SecurityXP}}
*{{RFP/User|Shadowdrake}}
*{{RFP/User|Wgyt}}

Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:21:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
::{{Done|Rights removed from ten (10) users}}. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 18:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

== Translation not possible ==

Hello, I have tried to translate the main page, but I receive an error: ''The title "Translations:Main Page/2/de" has been banned from creation. It matches the following blacklist entry: " Translations:.* "'' Is anybody able to activate the translation system again? Thanks --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 21:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

:[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] This is very strange because you're already logged in. I've referred this to [[User:Void|Void]] to see if he can take a look. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
:[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] Void has found the cause, and it seems it was an issue with our [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist|local title blacklist]], which, arguably, seemed unnecessary, so I've now {{Done|deleted}} the given [[Special:AllMessages|interface message]]. Please try translating now. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
::[[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] Thanks, now translating works. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 23:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
:::Okay, {{Done|great}}. Thanks again for reporting this. If I had to guess, we'd probably disabled translations by non-[[TestWiki:Administrators|administrators]] due to poor quality machine translations and translations being done outside the [[mw:Extension:Translate|translation system]]. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-03-21 ==

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-03-{{#expr: 21+7}}''' if they do not return to activity:
*{{RFP/User|Applemasterexpert}}
*{{RFP/User|Bonnedav}}
*{{RFP/User|Cactus754}}
*{{RFP/User|Gomdoli}}
*{{RFP/User|Gomezsil}}
*{{RFP/User|Hirok Raja}}
*{{RFP/User|Hsl0}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|Hypercane}}</s> [[Special:Redirect/logid/15235|resigned]]
*{{RFP/User|MS Sakib}}
*{{RFP/User|Mrheadman123}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|Rowe Wilson Frederisk Holme}}</s> now [[Special:Permalink/35082|active]]
*<s>{{RFP/User|Sabelöga}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/35081|active]]
*<s>{{RFP/User|Voidwalker}}</s> [[Special:Redirect/logid/15237|unneeded rights voluntarily removed from Void's alternate account]]
*{{RFP/User|松}}

Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:09:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
::{{Done|Rights removed from ten (10) users}}, notwithstanding the two users who voluntarily removed their user groups above. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

== Can my name be changed? ==

Hi, can I please have my name changed to Namielle please? Thank you! [[User:Theory of Eternity|Theory of Eternity]] ([[User talk:Theory of Eternity|talk]]) 12:41, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

:See [[meta:Special:GlobalRenameRequest]]. --[[User:Anton|Anton]] ([[User talk:Anton|talk]]) 12:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

==Edit request==
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
:The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
::Admins can unblock themselves. – [[User:Juslit|Olipino]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 14:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
----
{{talkquote|Please ensure you follow our [[TestWiki:Policies|policies]], especially [[TestWiki:Testing policy]] and [[TestWiki:Main policy]], reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on [[User:Example]] <s>or yourself.</s>}}. {{U|Anton}} and {{u|Dmehus}}, will anyone of you please remove '''or yourself''' from the above text. I see if users block themselves they are unable to do anything even they can't unblock themselves. I experienced this when I blocked my alternative account [[User:Flarehot|Flarehot]] and when {{u|Theory of Eternity}} blocked themselves. What do you people think? – [[User:Juslit|Olipino]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 13:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

:I've seen admins unblock themselves on Recent Changes, so I think it is possible for blocked admins to unblock themselves. I don't have admin powers myself, otherwise I'd test that for myself. [[User:Theory of Eternity|Theory of Eternity]] ([[User talk:Theory of Eternity|talk]]) 13:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

::Hi, Consul can remove the block from itself. Admins can't, to my knowledge. Thanks --[[User:Anton|Anton]] ([[User talk:Anton|talk]]) 13:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

::Sorry, I was wrong. The admin can unblock himself (<code>unblockself</code>). Please see [[Special:ListGroupRights]]. Thanks. --[[User:Anton|Anton]] ([[User talk:Anton|talk]]) 14:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
:::{{u|Anton}}, let me test. – [[User:Juslit|Olipino]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 14:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

::::Yes, what are you going to test? --[[User:Anton|Anton]] ([[User talk:Anton|talk]]) 14:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
:::::{{u|Anton}}, sorry for talking your time, I'm closing this discussion because yes <code>sysops</code> can unblock themselves as listed at [[Special:ListGroupRights]]. I tested block on myself and yes, I could unblock myself. Thank you! – [[User:Juslit|Olipino]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 14:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
----
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section </div>

== Change in the [[TestWiki:Main policy#Blocking and unblocking]] ==

Hello fellows, the policy clearly states that {{talkquote|You may create test accounts to test blocks or you can place blocks on yourself.}} It is ok to test blocks on yourself (your own/main account), but it also states {{talkquote|You may create test accounts to test blocks}} which, in my opinion is wrong. If users create an alternative account, the underlining IP address remains same and if they block the alternative account, their main account will also get blocked and won't be able to test anything since the IP address will be same in both the accounts. This happened to me (probably on my second day here). I'd suggest to replace {{talkquote|You may create test accounts to test blocks or you can place blocks on yourself.}} with {{talkquote|As a best practice, test blocked should be made on [[User:Example]] or yourself.}}
-- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 17:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

:Users ''can'' create alternate accounts, though. Nevertheless, this is fairly non-controversial, so if there's no objections, I'll close this as a non-controversial amendment after three calendar days by replacing the above with, "You may place clearly marked test blocks on yourself, on [[User:Example]], or on any alternate accounts you create for this purpose. As a best practice, it's recommended you (a) create any alternate accounts while logged into your main account and (b) identify any alternate accounts via your local or [[mw:Extension:GlobalUserPage|global]] user page in some way." How does that sound? [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 17:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
::{{U|Dmehus}}, since the IP block exemptions have been added to the <code>sysop</code> group, I have no objections. -- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 19:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
:::[[User:Juslit|Olipino]] Okay, {{Done|great}}. If you or [[User:Anton|Anton]] want to add the <code>ipblock-exempt</code> to the [[TestWiki:Administrators]] page, that'd be great, but ''do'' link to my Consul action in your edit summary using <code><nowiki>[[Special:Redirect/logid/15678|this Consul action]]</nowiki></code>. Thanks! [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 20:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
::::{{Done}} I've added <code>(ipblock-exempt)</code> to [[TW:A]]. -- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 20:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
:::::Thanks! [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 20:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

== Inconsistency regarding requirements to request Bureaucrat ==

I noticed that both [[TW:B]] and [[TW:RfP]] list different requirements to be eligible to obtain bureaucrat. [[TW:B]] states that a user must be a ''registered user'' for 24 hours before requesting bcrat, where as [[TW:RfP]] states that a user must be an ''administrator'' for 24 hours before requesting bcrat. Typically I would correct this issue myself, but I do not know what the real requirement is, so I am bringing it up here in hopes that someone else can rectify the issue. [[User:Joritochip|Joritochip]] ([[User talk:Joritochip|talk]]) 02:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
:<s>{{u|Joritochip}}, I think bureaucrats can only promote <code>[[TestWiki:Administrators|admins]]</code> to bureaucrats user right (but I may be wrong). That's why it may be necessary to be an admin for 24 hours. -- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 04:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)</s>
:[[User:Joritochip|Joritochip]] Interesting point. In ''theory'', I would say [[TestWiki:Bureaucrats]] would be correct, as one could theoretically have had a TestWiki account for more than twenty four hours but simply never requested [[TestWiki:Administrators|administrator]], so they've demonstrated that they're ''trusted''. In ''practice'', though, [[TestWiki:Request permissions]]' language may be the way to go. [[User:Reception123|Reception123]], do you have any thoughts? It is a [[TestWiki:Policies|policy]] page, but this a non-controversial administrative change I think we can clarify administratively as a [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] action. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
==Suggested move==
While testing, I came across the template, [[Template:RfPdone|RfPdone]]. I'd suggest to move it to the new more suitable title, <code>''AdminGranted''</code> or ''something similar''. I'd also like to make a new template to use when we will add someone to the bureaucrats group to let them know about the policies. Let me know who supports this. {{U|Dmehus}}, {{u|Anton}}, what do you think. -- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 13:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
:It serves a different purpose than {{tl|AdminAcceptRfP}}; however, I personally don't think it's needed, as everyone can be a TestWiki <code>[[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code>. I'm checking with [[User:Reception123|Reception123]] to see what he thinks. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
::{{u|Dmehus}}, you took me in the wrong way. I know it serves a different purpose. What I mean is "''this template should be posted on the talk page of a person who got the <code>admin</code> flag, to let them know about the TestWiki policies. Posting at the talk page produces a notification and a user is bound to see what it is.'' I know everyone can be admin but, not everyone knows about the policies. -- [[User:Juslit|Jusl<i><b>¡</b></i>t]] ([[user talk:Juslit|talk]]) 14:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
:::Yeah, I just think we don't necessarily ''need'' to be creating a user talk page message for every user who requests permissions at [[TestWiki:Request permissions]]. I mean, we can keep the template, but my ''preference'' would be for deletion. Arguably it would be better to encourage Bureaucrats and Consuls to use {{tl|AdminAcceptRfP}} and {{tl|BureaucratAcceptRfP}} at [[TestWiki:Request permissions]] when granting permissions, as then the [[Special:Diff|diff]] to the ''completed'' permission's request can be included within the requesting user's [[Special:UserRights|user rights log]], no? [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 14:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

== Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-04-18 ==

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after '''2021-04-{{#expr: 18+7}}''' if they do not return to activity:
*<s>{{RFP/User|Avengium}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/35698|active]]
*{{RFP/User|Eltomas2003}}
*{{RFP/User|JJPMaster}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|Justarandomamerican}}</s> rights removed per [[Special:Diff/35803|requested leave of absence]]
*{{RFP/User|NameIsA}}
*<s>{{RFP/User|SHEIKH}}</s> now [[Special:Diff/35701|active]]

Thanks,
:[[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]])
:For the Consul Team
:00:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Dmehus}} Hi, I've been busy for quite some time because of my exams. It will take me another week to return. Thanks [[User:SHEIKH|SHEIKH]] ([[User talk:SHEIKH|talk]]) 19:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
:::[[User:SHEIKH|SHEIKH]] No problem. In any case, the act of you [[Special:Diff/35701|replying]] to this thread has now made you active, so I've now updated that. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 19:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Dmehus}} I'm taking a long break from wikis in general because I have a lot of stuff to do in real life. Remove my rights if you wish. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 02:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
:::[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] Alright, sounds good. When you return, please feel free to request rights at [[TestWiki:Request permissions]] or at my [[User talk:Dmehus|user talk page]]. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 02:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
:{{Done|Rights removed from three (3) users}}, notwithstanding the user who requested voluntary removal of their rights while they are on an extended wiki leave of absence. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 16:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)


== AWB testing page ==
== AWB testing page ==

Revision as of 13:17, 24 June 2021

Community portal
Welcome to the TestWiki Community portal! On this page, matters pertaining to the local TestWiki community can be discussed.
Post your questions, comments, or concerns below by the big blue button to the immediate right.



AWB testing page

Hello an AWB testing page would be really useful.--Angelo Pisani (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Angelo Pisani Sure, I can see a use case for that. Please feel free to create AutoWikiBrowser test as the title for the page, then categorize it with Category:Special test pages. Dmehus (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Dmehus Done--Angelo Pisani (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Angelo Pisani That's great. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
PS the page must be added here.--Angelo Pisani (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Angelo Pisani:  Done. --Brewster239 (T/C) 14:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. I've updated the japanese version too.--Angelo Pisani (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-05-23

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after 2021-05-30 if they do not return to activity:

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk)
For the Consul Team
02:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 Rights removed from ten (10) users. Dmehus (talk) 01:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wordmark

I propose that we use the following as our new wordmark. What does people think?

MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 20:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is so small, and our logo already includes the words "Public Test Wiki." I'm not certain we need this here. I propose we just have the space allocated for the wordmark in New Vector be whitespace instead. Dmehus (talk) 22:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is too small Shakil (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello MacFan4000, I would like to say that the proposed wordmark is small and, at least to me, it seems it's width is more than its height. And well that's not an issue.
I can't read what is written on the two sides of the triangle. It looks like it's pixels has broken and the current one seems to be more clearer. Thanks:) Mazzaz (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Inactive Rights Removal - 2021-06-24

The rights of the following users will be removed on or after 2021-07-01 if they do not return to activity:

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk)
For the Consul Team
13:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)