User talk:Melba Insieme

Testing on non-test pages

Hi Melba Insieme,

I noticed that you performed a test deletion of TestWiki:Community portal/Archive 1 in this log action, which you restored promptly by this log action. While it was great that you promptly restored your test deletion on that talk page archive, since there are so many special purpose testing pages, plus new pages and your userspace sandbox can be created for further testing, there's really no need for testing on those pages, and should probably be avoided.

Thanks,
--Dmehus (talk) 16:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Communication is required

Hi Melba Insieme,

Following your further tests, principally, of the delete function, I noted that you have subsequently deleted a flurry of existing user talk pages, which are not normally deleted. It appears you have restored all the deleted pages, but because communication is required, I am asking for you to please acknowledge, on-wiki, that you have received and understood both this warning message and the previous friendly note regarding tests on non-test pages, construed broadly, before you make any further usage of the administrator tools.

Note: I have had to notify a consul of this warning message.

Thanks,
Dmehus (talk) 19:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

I have read both messages above and will be careful about what I delete. I had been testing the nuke function on recent new pages. Melba Insieme (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Melba Insieme: Okay, that is fine, but for testing Special:Nuke, what's actually better is to create several pages, tagged with the same category, i.e. something like Category:Nuke pages test or something, and then you can just nuke all those pages. Dmehus (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Language in your tests

Hi Melba Insieme,

Regarding your further test edits, I noticed this log action, which contained language that is both unacceptable for an administrator, let alone a bureaucrat, to use really anywhere on- or off-wiki. Additionally, the diction and style used in your written prose is remarkably similar to this deleted contribution of another user.

Given the above, I have had again to refer this matter to a Consul who will decide what additional action(s) need to be taken here (if any).

Cheers,
Dmehus (talk) 13:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Per the concerns raised both above and in other sections of this page, your rights have been revoked. RhinosF1 (talk) 15:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I thought it wouldn't matter much if I hid the content right afterwards. Melba Insieme (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Creating nonsense on talk pages won't help. RhinosF1 (talk) 13:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

I won't do that any more. Sorry. Melba Insieme (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

And yet you did by creating Talk:Filter test with "Hi people.". If you're going to create an unnecessary page, at least request deletion from any administrator it after creating it, which you've been warned about above. Given this, I'm going to confer with @RhinosF1: regarding next steps here. Dmehus (talk) 01:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I thought by "nonsense" they meant gibberish. At least I put a coherent greeting on this page. But maybe I'll find something else to do here. Melba Insieme (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I did mean gibberish but I'm getting closer and closer to knowing you're abusing multiple accounts. I ain't playing a game and you know full well we have existing test pages you can use. As a gift to you, here's a block from all non user talk pages. RhinosF1 (talk) 06:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I will only perform appropiate tests here from now on, and not use any more accounts here. Sorry for all the trouble I've caused here and I will do my best to show that I can be trusted here. Melba Insieme (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Can I please be unblocked?

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Melba Insieme (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked so I can continue testing text code and eventually administrator and bureaucrat abilities here. I understand that this would be my last chance here, and I will only use this account at this wiki from now on. And I promise not to put any bad words in my tests or make nonsense pages, and I will undo all my tests. I would really appreciate having this last chance. Thank you. Melba Insieme (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your last chance was 3 accounts ago. RhinosF1 (talk) 10:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

@Melba Insieme: Which account(s) did you use before? Reception123 (talk) 11:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

My previous accounts were Bugambilia, Melan, Aeonia Rose, and Brightshine Rose, and they all are now globally locked. Around a month ago I had emailed the stewards about unlocking my Bugambilia account, so I could use it again, but I never heard back from them. Melba Insieme (talk) 11:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

@Melba Insieme: Creating a new account is not a good idea. Please contact stewardsmiraheze.org again if you would like your unlock request to be re-considered. If there is still not an answer, you may contact cvtmiraheze.org afterwards. Reception123 (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)