TestWiki:Request permissions/Archive 13

From TestWiki
< TestWiki:Request permissions
Revision as of 15:53, 10 May 2023 by HeyTürkiye (talk | contribs) (Applications Archived.)

BrandonWM (Administrator)

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 19:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

 Deferred to a Consul per active user rights restriction. — Chrs (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Dmehus (talk) 08:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Supplementary comment: to note my comments here, which clarifies that the first criterion of the user restriction is no longer applicable as Chrs may or may not have seen that. In any case, please ensure that you adhere to the other provisions, with a particular emphasis on any bold changes to non-test pages, page moves, etc. Your restriction doesn't preclude such changes entirely, but rather I would just like to see you gain the consent of at least one other trusted user (two would be better) before making such changes. Dmehus (talk) 08:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Airtransat236 (Bureaucrat)

Airtransat236 (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. — Chrs (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Bureaucrat)

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 23:14, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

 Defer to a Consul for discussion and consensus. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 23:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Personally I would like bureaucrats to be able to continue to handle this. I'm glad that BrandonWM is back but would prefer they spend more time as a sysop just in case. Naleksuh (talk) 02:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Also, it looks like the request rationale is for testing bureaucrat permissions. There is generally not a need to test bureaucrat permissions, as all bureaucrats can do is add and remove user groups and edit protected pages, both of which sysops can do. There's not usually a need to request bureaucrat permissions for testing unless there is something very specific going on, and is usually more for tasks such as RFP or blocks at a lower level than consuls. Naleksuh (talk) 02:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
No issues from me in crats handling as a normal request. Looks like we have to ask all consuls though. RhinosF1 (talk) 06:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
@BrandonWM: Having looked at your past editing records on miraheze, I feel glad that you come back with a positive change of your behaviours. However, I would like to see more contributions and let it go for more time before requesting for bureaucrat here, since your recent edits are mostly asking for unblock. Also, can you state what permissions do you want to test out specifically? Thanks. --Matttest (talk) 08:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Oppose this user is still under fairly heavy sanctions on other wikis, as well as heavy sanctions on projects heavily related to Miraheze. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 17:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Strong oppose: Still has sanctions on other wikis. Cigaryno (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Not done per above. It is appears there is clear opposition to granting bureaucrat at this time. I also didn't like the user requesting self-deferring their request (that's supposed to be done by a bureaucrat, and definitely not by the user requesting) and also striking out other user's comments even though there's no precedent for that, or any type of vote. Most importantly, a consul has said above that there is no issue with bureaucrats processing the request. Accordingly, as a bureaucrat I mark this as Not done. Naleksuh (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

FirstNoelle (Admin)

FirstNoelle (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

@FirstNoelle: Are you sure? Cigaryno (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Why wouldn't I be sure? FirstNoelle (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Cigaryno (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
@FirstNoelle: You are ApexAgunomu? AlPaD (talk) 18:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
no. FirstNoelle (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
You are blocked on Qualitipedia for this reason. AlPaD (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
But it's not true. FirstNoelle (talk) 18:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
@FirstNoelle: OK, I hope you are telling the truth. AlPaD (talk) 18:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
@Dmehus, just to see if AIPaD’s suspicions are true, would you mind running a CU, just in case it’s block evasion. Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
@AlPaD: @Zippybonzo: I would suggest mentioning this at the Stewards' noticeboard if you want to request a CU. Also, please note that you will need to link to evidence in such a request. — Chrs (talk) 23:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Locked by Raidarr as a sockpuppet of ApexAgunomu. — Chrs (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Emuritto (Admin)

Emuritto (talk) 08:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
@Emuritto: You are ApexAgunomu? AlPaD (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
No. Emuritto (talk) 23:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Wonderful! A CheckUser will be run, just to confirm that you’re not them. A Steward should execute the request within the hour, to make sure! Once that’s settled, I hope you enjoy your stay at Public Test Wiki! But if you are Apex…enjoy the inevitable lock. Of course, if you are Apex, stewards might be nicer if you admitted to it before we lock you. Just some food for thought! BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 23:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
I'll leave my reply on Meta's Steward board. Emuritto (talk) 00:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Emuritto (Bureaucrat)

Emuritto (talk) 22:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

@Emuritto: Not a bureaucrat, but automatically Not done as it has not been 24 hours since you were granted administrator. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 22:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Please note the user is also pending further investigation on suspicion of being a sock puppet of a globally banned user, ApexAgunomu. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 23:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Syunsyunminmin (Admin)

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 07:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
@Syunsyunminmin are you ApexAgonomu, I can’t help it because they have a history of block evasion. Kind Regards, Zippybonzo (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
@Syunsyunminmin: But please tell the truth. Regards! AlPaD (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
@Zippybonzo: No, I'm not. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Erté (Administrator)

Status:  Done by AlPaD

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
@Erté Hi, please can you use the add request button at the top. Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Blua lago (Admin)

Blua lago (talk) 19:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 19:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Syunsyunminmin (Bureaucrat)

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 07:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Request Withdrawn by BrandonWM
  • User: BrandonWM ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: I’d like bureaucrat on Public Test Wiki in order to be able to grant other users’ rights requests and execute more bureaucrat actions on the wiki. I have been an admin for 2 weeks now.

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 14:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

 Deferred to a consul for review. AlPaD (talk) 07:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I'll ping the other consuls to give opinion. I have no issue with crats handling though. RhinosF1 (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned about this user’s understanding of this wiki’s purpose and it’s understanding of the policies. Some of the reasons are listed below:
  1. He blocks users because he/she is inserting nonsense to pages: [1], [2]
  2. Recently he deleted a template because it is not used officially by PTW, which is against our commitment to let users to “experiment with administrator and bureaucrat permissions, templates, extensions, and other features provided by the MediaWiki software”.
    Crossed out per BrandonWM’s reply below. -Matttest (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
For#1, it is problematic for 3 reasons: (i) serious blocks should be placed by consuls, not admins; (ii) the block is not appropriate since TestWiki have no issues users testing and adding nonsense to pages, as long as it doesn’t violates the policies; (iii) the duration of block is set to 3 months and even prohibit them from editing their own talk page as of only 1 edit, with no warnings (even if it is a problem).
As such, I will Oppose be neutral on this request. If a satisfactory reply is given later on, I may consider to change this, but as of now I failed to see his understanding of the purposes and policies of PTW. That’s the sole purpose I am opposing this request. Matttest (talk) 03:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Changed per BrandonWM’s reply below. -Matttest (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
To respond to Matttest’s concerns outlined in the above comment, here is my response:
1. I blocked the IP address as it was inserting nonsense into pages, which the abuse filter blocks very commonly for. I followed the abuse filter blocks to the letter, 3 months, etc.
2. I deleted the template as I’ve recently seen countless templates being deleted because they were unused and unnecessary. Indeed, I conversed with consuls and bureaucrats on IRC, and they expressed support for the deletion of unused and unnecessary templates. I believe that action was justified, and while I will not revert your log actions as to not create an edit war, I still believe the template should be deleted as we don’t permit nonsense pages or templates.
I am well versed in the policies of Public Test Wiki, and I act in a manner according to other users’ actions as theirs have been accepted. I will not do what another bureaucrat has not already done without conversing with multiple consuls. I personally feel that I’ve acted in a manner that most other bureaucrats would. The block was likely wrong, yes, but if you check the deletion log you’ll see a long long list of template deletions.
Thank you for your time,
BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 06:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Support The user has improved since being unblocked. AlPaD (talk) 09:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Strong oppose I echo the same vote I had last time this was requested. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 18:32, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Zppix Thought it prudent to note for the record that I am not under heavy sanctions on Miraheze wikis, there are minor restrictions here and there. As such your previous statement is now factually incorrect. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 19:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
I am literally one of the people on the team that imposed them. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 19:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Except, Zppix, most of those “severe” restrictions have been removed as I have shown growth and competency. But somehow you refuse to see that. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 19:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Okay...this conversation is definitely starting to remind me of the problems that happened in late 2020 and I am getting concerned. Firstly, why did you re-request bureaucrat a week and a half after the previous request was declined? I also noticed that you changed the request rationale, but am concerned this is only because you were told the previous one wouldn't work. Are you looking to request bureaucrat permissions on test wiki just to become one, or to hat collect? Naleksuh (talk) 20:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
First off, the two reasons you stated for me becoming a bureaucrat are the same. Second, I’m re-requesting 10 days after, as users generally get bureaucrat 1 day after requesting admin, not 14. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 20:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Alright, let me quote some sanctions placed on you within other Miraheze Wikis, for this example fossbots:
  • Access to use bots provided by us is now allowed in full.
  • The block from the wiki is removed.
  • Phabricator & GitHub access will not be allowed until the user has spent at least 60 days demonstrating they are following the conditions and have learnt from the past.
  • This will be subject to a 0 strike policy.
(End quote from appeal email from FOSSBots LTD)
I consider a 0 strike policy on a wiki and on a otherwise heavily affiliated project to be fairly serious, so I reiterate, once again my reason for opposing. Thanks. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 01:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Right, Zppix. Now that our wiki farm is back up I’ll note a few things. 1) FOSSBOTS may be a service Miraheze employs, but in no way are sanctions on either connected. FOSSBOTS is not operated by Miraheze. Second, access to bots is allowed in full, with GitHub and Phabricator allowed in 2 months. That’s a pretty basic restriction, and the 0 strike policy is simple. They are not “serious” or “severe” restrictions. I also re-iterate that FOSSBOTS is not owned nor operated by Miraheze Limited in any capacity. Miraheze employs FOSSBOTS’ services, that’s all. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 02:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
I think that's enough back-and-forth. While it is true that Fossbots's standing with Miraheze is questionable at best (one of the reasons they were no longer allowed to call themselves Miraheze Bots), and I would not regard a block on a wiki where the user had no local edits as damaging a user's reputation, there appears to be controversy regarding this request. It also does seem to be rather straightforward after the previous one, and some possible misuse of sysop tools has been pointed out. I would encourage BrandonWM to remain a sysop here and be relatively problem-free, not focusing on hat collecting or back and forths. While a consul has confirmed that there is no issue with bureaucrats processing the request, I closed the last one so will hold off unless no one else does. Naleksuh (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Please cite your source to your claim that weren’t allowed to call ourself Miraheze Bots. We changed names purely because our scope expanded, and because concerns were raised, HOWEVER, we were never once told we had to change our name. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 03:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
All I implied was that 1) FOSSBOTS’ wiki is hosted by Miraheze and considering you are indeed sanctioned there, my claim is factual, 2) Affliated in the sense that it’s history is very much intertwined within Miraheze as well, not to mention 99% of FOSSBOTs contains former or current Miraheze sysadmins, or other advanced right holders. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 03:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Not sure which comment you were replying to. I don't recall saying that. I recall you saying that BrandonWM was not suitable for bureaucrat permissions and I agreed with that assessment. My statement is that I believe blocks on wikis where there are no local edits hold zero water, due to the nature of anyone being able to block anyone at any time (i.e. mh:dev:Special:Block/Zppix). I'm not sure whether you are confused about my position on the request, or just turning from an opportunity to antagonize BrandonWM into both of us. Naleksuh (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
This reply wasnt towards you. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 03:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done per clear consensus and withdrawal. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 15:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

PercyUK (Bureaucrat)

PercyUK (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Do note that Public Test Wiki bureaucrat does not entitle access to Special:ManageWiki/extensions, only Consuls have access to that. Agent Isai Talk to me! 19:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

The Dark Lord (Administrator and Bureaucrat)

The Dark Lord (talk) 23:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Okay, thank you A1Pad. The Dark Lord (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

1otheraaa (Interface administrator)

  • Status:  Declined by Dmehus
  • User: 1otheraaa ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Interface administrator
  • Reason for requesting: Test out what parts of the interface changes and so on (if you can't give me that just give me normal administrator and tell me what I need to do)

--1otheraaa (talk) 19:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

1otheraaa, that's a no to interface-admin per the newness of your account, this strange edit, and no valid reason for requesting the permission. As to sysop, unless you can sufficiently explain this edit and/or provide a confirmation edit to an account elsewhere on another wiki platform (i.e., Wikimedia) or a pre-existing Miraheze account, I'm inclined to say no as well, at least until I get a better sense of your edits here. Dmehus (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Trke (Administrator)

Trke (talk) 11:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 11:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Fee1-dead (Admin)

Fee1-dead (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 14:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Kiko4564 (Bureaucrat)

Kiko4564 (talk) 11:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done Welcome back! AlPaD (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Challenge812 (Admin)

Challenge812 (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Locked by Agent Isai as a sockpuppet of ApexAgunomu. AlPaD (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Hoof Hearted (Admin)

Hoof Hearted (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Vista Valkyrie (Admin)

Vista Valkyrie (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Please note that this user is blocked by DarkMatterMan on Qualtipedia as sock of ApexAgunomu who is banned. Buel (talk) 08:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Not done As sockpuppet. AlPaD (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Buel (Admin)

Buel (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

09limbua ()

09limbua (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

 Deferred to a Consul for a decision, per block on 2 other wikis. AlPaD (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
What are those wikis and why does it matter? We don't sanction for behaviour on other wikis. Kiko4564 (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I think a consul should look at the request due to behavior on other wikis and the user must note in the request, the permission is requesting. AlPaD (talk) 12:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Am m (Admin)

Am m (talk) 16:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

MdaNoman (Admin)

Not done Bureaucrats will only be granted to a user who is 1 day administrator. AlPaD (talk) 20:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
I didn't notice the policy. I have switched to admin. And that might be granted.MdaNoman (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

ElmoFX ()

ElmoFX (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

@ElmoFX: Hello! you should tell what rights are you asking for? Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially Testing policy and Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself.（Special:diff/46287）--Sai10ukazuki (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

MdaNoman (Bureaucrat)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 18:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ZeusDeeGoose (Admin)

ZeusDeeGoose (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 19:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Lolkikmoddi (admin)

Lolkikmoddi (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Texas Elizabeth (Admin)

Texas Elizabeth (talk) 14:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself.--MdaNoman (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Someone should revoke this user, especially with this strange creation, which is a red flag that eerily reminds me of a certain someone. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 22:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Revoked for being a CheckUser confirmed sockpuppet of ApexAgunomu. Sadly, this proves the case made against her in her appeals RfC. Agent Isai Talk to me! 23:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Lolkikmoddi (bureaucrat)

Lolkikmoddi (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Szczypak2005 (bureaucrat)

Szczypak 2005 27 October 2022, 08:03 (GMT+2)

Not done You need be an admin for 24 hours and have 10 edits to become a bureaucrat. AlPaD (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

QWERASDF (Admin)

QWERASDF (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself.--Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Garuda19 (Admin)

Garuda19 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Locked by Agent Isai as a sockpuppet of ApexAgunomu. AlPaD (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

QWERASDF (Bureaucrat)

QWERASDF (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

What testing are you exactly seeking to do? Agent Isai Talk to me! 13:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Not done You haven’t replied in 5 days so I’m going to decline the request as stale. Silicona (talk) 15:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Texas Rose 1988 (Admin)

Texas Rose 1988 (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 16:57, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Locked as a sockpuppet of Apex. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 04:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Gani (Admin)

Gani (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Sakura emad (Admin & Bureaucrat)

i was both admin and Bureaucrat i removed my advanced rights because i didn't need them back then, but now i am back i want to have them again thanks. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done --Brewster239 (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Done by AlPaD
  • User: BrandonWM ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: For additional testing and administrative purposes. I am aware of the policies of TestWiki, and will follow them. I can also be of assistance in granting other users' rights requests.

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 18:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Rocielshinonome (Admin)

Rocielshinonome (talk) 06:46, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Gani (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Declined by BrandonWM
  • User: Gani ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: For additional testing and administrative purposes. I am aware of TestWiki's policies, and will follow them I can also help other users grant rights requests

Gani (talk) 13:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

@Gani: Out of curiosity, why did you copy/paste my requesting reason for bureaucrat and put it on yours? I'm happy to grant the request when the 24 hour mark is reached, but just curious. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 16:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
@BrandonWM i think they're not ready to be a Bureaucrat, i would like to see some more admin activity before that. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
@Sakura emad: On second look, you appear to be right. User has not reached the required minimum of 10 edits here on TestWiki, marking as Not done and closing appropriately. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 16:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Davidvia (Admin)

Davidvia (talk) 15:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Noelle Elizabeth (Admin)

Noelle Elizabeth (talk) 01:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 02:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Revoked as a sockpuppet of Apex. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 00:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Noelle Elizabeth (Bureaucrat)

Noelle Elizabeth (talk) 19:38, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 19:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Revoked per above. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 02:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Gani (Bureaucrat)

Gani (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Revoked by Zppix for violations of the Terms of Service and long-term and cross-wiki abuse. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 16:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Melba Fiona (Admin)

Melba Fiona (talk) 18:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Blad (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Done by Brewster239
  • User: Blad ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: I'd like to request this as I have now met the requirements, and having the bureaucrat role is useful for testing. Thank you.

Blad (talk) 13:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. Brewster239 (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Seiyena (Admin)

Seiyena (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Locked by Reception123 as a sockpuppet of ApexAgunomu. AlPaD (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Gifted9 (Admin)

  • Status:  Done by BrandonWM
  • User: Gifted9 ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Admin
  • Reason for requesting: i'm trying to tinker with some admin tools while my db141 wiki is down. i've familiarized myself with policy & will revert my actions - thanks!

Gifted9 (talk) 03:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 05:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

CECBowlingGreen (Admin)

  • Status:  Done by AlPaD
  • User: CECBowlingGreen ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Admin
  • Reason for requesting: I would like to test out the Miraheze code because I don't have too much experience with it as I've only been editing on wikis with Miraheze since August 2022.

CECBowlingGreen (talk) 23:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Farmer Cars (Bureaucrat)

Farmer Cars (talk) 15:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Not done Sorry, but you must already be an administrator to be eligible for Bureaucrat. You can request for admin rights. Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Farmer Cars (Admin)

Farmer Cars (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 12:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Farmer Cars (Bureaucrat)

Farmer Cars (talk) 13:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Not done Bureaucrats will only be granted to a user who is 1 day administrator. AlPaD (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok, i'll wait until tomorrow. - Farmer Cars (talk) 13:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
This is your second time requesting the bureaucrat permission and your second time being denied, solely because of TestWiki policy. The first time, it was because you didn’t have the sysop permission. The second time, it’s because you haven’t been an admin for a day. I would recommend you take some time to familiarize yourself with TestWiki policies before requesting the crat bit again.
In addition, all you say when requesting the permission is “to test bureaucrat features.” Bureaucrats don’t have that many more permissions than sysops. Could you please elaborate on your rationale for requesting the bit? BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 08:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Farmer Cars (Bureaucrat)

Farmer Cars (talk) 10:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

While I am hesitant to grant this right given the past malformed requests and the fact that your only 10 edits came from your user page, I’m going to grant this request.  Done However, please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 16:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

NotAracham (Admin)

NotAracham (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Done also granted crat. Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 21:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Artillect (Admin)

Artillect (talk) 03:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 04:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Faience (Admin)

Faience (talk) 01:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 01:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Revoked per CheckUser analysis which proves a connection to ApexAgunomu. Very unfortunate that she keeps socking and keeps proving that a global unban is not in the future. Agent Isai Talk to me! 01:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Elijah Wilder (Admin/Sysop)

Elijah Wilder (talk) 16:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 16:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Treinta Maria (Admin)

Treinta Maria (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Airtransat236 (talk) 18:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Treinta Maria (Bureaucrat)

Treinta Maria (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Bureaucrat is a role of advanced trust and you're a relatively new user. There is nothing an bureaucrat can do that an admin can't so I am declining this for now. Agent Isai Talk to me! 23:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Collei (Admin)

Collei (talk) 02:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 02:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

XtexChooser (Admin/Sysop)

XtexChooser (talk) 15:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

HeyTürkiye (Admin)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. LisafBia (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
I would consider HeyTurkiye pretty trustworthy, but he has not been an admin and has not made 10 edits, so I think this promotion may be a bit contentious. Blad (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Nevermind, HT never received the bureaucrat role, which is what the post preceding the above made me believe. Blad (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Revival (Admin)

Revival (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 21:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Hypercane (Administrator)

Hypercane (talk) 08:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Universal Omega (talk) 08:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Alidonis (Admin)

Alidonis (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 06:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Trke (Admin)

Trke (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Former sysop. Removal by inactivity, not abuse. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Galigonen (Admin)

Galigonen (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 10:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

UnGiglio (Admin)

Giglio Ω 16:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 16:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Jaben1777 (Admin)

  • Status:  Done by AlPaD
  • User: Jaben1777 ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Admin
  • Reason for requesting: For testing research purposes, disregard the previous attempt at adminship, as it was prematurely submitted, thus resulting in an incorrect request.

Jaben1777 (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Justarandomamerican (Admin)

Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done by Naleksuh.--Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

LC Developer (Administrator)

  • Status:  Done by Agent Isai
  • User: LC Developer ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Administrator
  • Reason for requesting: I would like administrator rights to test out the abilities. It is also my goal to become a bureaucrat once I meet those requirements. I have read and am familiar with the policies.

LC Developer (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Remember to be patient. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Agent Isai Talk to me! 20:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for accepting my request and for the information. I apologize if I came off as impatient, I just wanted to make sure I did all the requirements, and the page was a little unclear on whether I should apply at one or both places. LC Developer (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

LC Developer (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Declined by Naleksuh
  • User: LC Developer ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: I would like to continue testing the tools as a Bureaucrat. I also would like to grant other users the rights they need/want to test and learn on here. I am familiar with the policies surrounding bureaucratship, adminship, and TestWiki in general. I have not abused my admin rights and am very active in this community. I have met the 10-edit requirement (I have about 50) and the 24hr requirement.

LC Developer (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Bureaucrat is normally granted to established users only. I have no issues with this request but I'd like to wait a little longer before granting. Agent Isai Talk to me! 19:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
@Agent Isai: I understand, but I would like to test with crat permissions and grant new users administrator permissions. I am somewhat established, and am very active here. I am also an admin and crat on my home wiki. Is there anything I can do/answer that would make you feel more comfortable?
In addition, I sometimes see edits with permissions being granted tagged with Tag:userRightsManagerTW. If granted crat rights, how do I install the gadget? LC Developer (talk) 19:57, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Some of the changes you have mad were useful but I would like to avoid granting bureaucrat now as it has not been that long and I have had to revert a lot of the changes (for example, protecting a MediaWiki page at sysop level even though non-sysops can't edit it anyway). There should be no issue with granting it eventually but not yet Naleksuh (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
@Naleksuh: Okay, I completely understand. I need to learn a little more before gaining this right. What do you mean by eventually? A few hours, days, weeks, months, years? LC Developer (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Firstly, editing a message to add a ping will not ping smoeone. See w:template:ping fix for more info. Second, I meant more like a week or so rather than months/years. It's not considered a high-trust role like consul is, but not something to grant very readily Naleksuh (talk) 20:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for the information about pinging. I will reapply in about a week and once I have gained more experience. LC Developer (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
I would discourage requesting these rights in the immediate future not because you haven't filled a time bar, but because you have a fair few bits to work out in really understanding and applying TestWiki's scope. Frankly you seem quite new to the interface, and needing to be reviewed extensively because of this is not encouraging for bureaucrat nor is it something that resolves itself in just a week. Be more established perhaps, work out the quirks before considering the role. Two days doesn't really cut established/active and having a wiki is not pertinent. I should also note that even with crat you should not be closing central community discussions as evidently happened just a little while ago: that is the purview of a Consul. It's avoiding things like this which demonstrate understanding, more than having just read the text of policy, and it's how you get the trust which is the other aspect of requesting bureaucrat. --Raidarr (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello @Raidarr and thank you for the advice. I will only apply for crat in the future once I have understood more about the software and processes of TestWiki, absolutely no less than 1 week from now. I will work out the quirks before considering the role. As for closing the RfC, I apologize, I was unaware that only consuls could close them, as I had seen other, non-consuls close them, and I couldn’t find anywhere that said they could only be closed by consuls. I will not do this in the future. Again, thank you for the feedback, and have a great day! LC Developer (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Elijah Wilder (Bureaucrat)

Elijah Wilder (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

What exactly do you want to test? Agent Isai Talk to me! 14:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
I want to help do permission requests mainly. I also want to be able to grant more permissions too.Elijah Wilder (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
@Agent Isai: Hello! According to the policy the user meets the criteria for bureaucrat flag. Do you agree to grant the rights? AlPaD (talk) 11:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
I don't know if the trustworthy criterion can be fulfilled. Do you vouch for this user in that aspect? Agent Isai Talk to me! 11:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Until now we have approved user requests with more than 10 edits that have been for at least 24 hours admins and have not caused any problem in the past. Are there any other criteria to be considered trustworthy? AlPaD (talk) 12:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
@Agent Isai and @AlPaD: I don't really care about the outcome of this request, but I believe the user to be trustworthy. They are active on other test wikis as crats and haven't abused the rights. LC Developer (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 Done This user is trustworthy based on their actions here and on other testwikis. Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. LC Developer (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

1108-Kiju (Admin)

1108-Kiju (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 15:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. --1108-Kiju (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Rafdo (Admin)

  • Status:  Declined by Naleksuh
  • User: Rafdo ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Admin
  • Reason for requesting: I know Wikipedia's sandbox, but it automatically clears. I want a sandbox that doesn't clear. Miraheze says I should use publictestwiki

Rafdo (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Our sandbox also automatically clears, but you can make a sandbox that doesn't clear in your own userspace both on Wikipedia and here. Nor do you really need sysop tools for that. Naleksuh (talk) 16:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
@Rafdo, as @Naleksuh said above, you don't need sysop tools to have a sandbox that doesn't clear. You can use your Sandbox by clicking the link. As you have not responded, I am marking this request as Not done. If for some other reason you would like Administrator rights, feel free to make a new request with valid reasoning. LC Developer (talk) 12:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
I already marked the request as not done, and the template doesn't support more than one person. Naleksuh (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

LC Developer (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Done by MdsShakil
  • User: LC Developer ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: It has been about a week since I last requested crat rights here. I would like them to continue my testing, and to be able to grant other users the rights they need to test. For a sake of transparency, My last request was declined with the comments:

I have no issues with this request but I'd like to wait a little longer before granting -Agent

There should be no issue with granting it eventually but not yet -Naleksuh

I believe I am now ready for crat rights. I now have over 100 edits and am much more familiar with the scope of TestWiki. I have also been doing more simple, general improvement edits, such as rewording confusing statements. As a potential crat, I understand when and when not to grant rights to other users.

Thanks, LC Developer (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Not sure if this is relevant, but I am an Admin and crat on testwiki.wiki. LC Developer (talk) 17:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Why did you mark a request as declined that was already marked as declined, and also do so as a non-bureaucrat? Naleksuh (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello @Naleksuh. I marked the request as declined because it appears you forgot to. In this diff you declined the request with a comment, but forgot to change the status to declined. I just wanted to help you, and TestWiki by declining the request for you, as it was clear you forgot. I first added my name (for some reason, I don’t know why), but then I changed it to both our names, as I was the one that was making the edit, and you were the one that declined it. Maybe I shouldn’t have done it because I wasn’t a crat, but I was just trying to help you out. LC Developer (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
For a sake of transparency, relevant discussion on this request occurred at User talk:Agent Isai. LC Developer (talk) 11:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. MdsShakil (talk) 23:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Zippybonzo (Admin & Bureaucrat)

Zippybonzo (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

 Administrator granted. Bureaucrat isn't really used a lot for testing so I'm not going to grant it at this moment but if you continue to help out here then we can consider that. Thanks! Agent Isai Talk to me! 19:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
@Agent Isai as far as I’m aware, if you have rights removed for inactivity, you get the rights that you used to have restored. I did previously use the Bureaucrat right, so would it be possible to get the right back? Thanks, Zippybonzo (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Justman (Admin, preferably Bureaucrat)

Justman (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 Administrator granted Bureaucrat user right will only be granted to a user who has been an administrator for 24 hours. AlPaD (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Justman (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Done by AlPaD
  • User: Justman ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: After numerous edits on my part, I would like to apply for bureaucratic rights in order to be able to optimise my work... This request can be processed when its time comes (if one understands).

Justman (talk) 22:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. AlPaD (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Mayfair (Administrator)

Mayfair (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Administrator)

  • Status:  Done by Naleksuh
  • User: BrandonWM ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Administrator
  • Reason for requesting: I will regularly be active on the TestWiki and will be helping to keep the wiki up and running, including granting permissions requests. I have been an administrator and bureaucrat previously, which is why I am requesting both bits at once and not just sysop. However, if I am asked to obtain sysop for 24 hours before crat, I am happy to oblige.

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 21:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Good job getting your editing restrictions lifted! You deserve this. LC Developer (talk) 21:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 Deferred Due to the reason for the removal of rights, this time it is better for a consul to take over, but I support the restoration of the user's rights. AlPaD (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Granted sysop. I would not recommend granting bureaucrat at least for now in case something goes wrong. Also the canvassing and edit warring issues still are not resolved. Naleksuh (talk) 07:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
You mean because he's already been thrown out three times? Yikes? Justman (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
@Justman: I am going to remind you of the Global Conduct Policy. Conduct like the message above is not appropriate for Miraheze's platforms. Thank you. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 13:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
As already mentioned in the meta... Justman (talk) 14:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
To be honest, I don't really care what was mentioned or where. Conduct like this is completely across the line. It violates the GCP and the VCP. If you find yourself unable to follow these policies, you may relieve yourself of your permissions on Miraheze. That is the standard set for all, and no one is above it. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 14:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
And as I said, the answer to which this refers was tied to a real fact! So there is nothing rude about it! It was only a factually related comment or answer Justman (talk) 15:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not really sure you fully understand the meaning of the word civility. If you did, you'd know that this isn't it. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 19:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Declined by Naleksuh
  • User: BrandonWM ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: I will be frequently active, helping with management of TestWiki and permissions requests. I am trusted within the Miraheze community.

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 00:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done per going around previous request. Also looks like you deleted a bunch of pages for a questionable reason. if translations were made for serious reasons they're unnecessary on a process such as testwiki Why are they unnecessary? This is a multilingual project and while I think the MediaWiki translate system is hard to use, it's not like translations are only for "serious" purposes- they exist because 87% of the world does not speak English. Naleksuh (talk) 03:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
@Naleksuh: I agree with you about the translation pages deletion, but what was wrong with the edit you linked. It just appears that @BrandonWM changed the status to accepted and the role to admin because you said you would only give admin. Also, why did you revert Al Pads edits to fix your template mistake? LC Developer (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
@Naleksuh: They were deleted after conversation with another user on Miraheze Spaces and agreed that they were unnecessary. Most of my deletions were templates, categories, and user pages (neither of which should be translated). Additionally, TestWiki is meant for testing admin/bureaucrat permissions. There isn't supposed to be much bureaucracy on or around this wiki, and so translating stuff that isn't for a testing purpose is unnecessary. The RfP header for example, also doesn't need to be translated because no one is navigating to the header itself, they're navigating to this page. Hope that answers the question. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 14:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
@Naleksuh also declined your request because of this edit. I disagree with them about that, as I said above. Do you have an explanation for that? LC Developer (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not really sure how I "went around the request". I didn't change the reason for requesting, or remove anyone's comments. I changed the user group to what was granted. Not really sure how that was in error at all, all comments are still visible.... BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 15:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
The amount of "bureaucracy" on a wiki and translations are two completely different subjects. Translations exist because 87% of the world does not speak English, not for "bureaucracy". Naleksuh (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Another reason to be careful before deleting translatable pages is that they are very hard to get back...as I have now discovered. Naleksuh (talk) 21:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
The translations were deleted after consulting another user on Miraheze Spaces who agreed with my opinion of the situation. Not sure why they need to be restored. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 22:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Also, there is absolutely no reason for categories, pages, or templates to have translations on them. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 22:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

BrandonWM (Bureaucrat)

  • Status:  Done by LC Developer
  • User: BrandonWM ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
  • Reason for requesting: Same reason as stated above. I would prefer this request is handled by someone other than Naleksuh, as there is a substantial conflict of interest there.

BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 00:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please seek consensus before making big changes, and don’t do what got you your editing restrictions implemented. Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. LC Developer (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

The Pro Gamer 2 (Admin)

The Pro Gamer 2 (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. LC Developer (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Zippybonzo (Bureaucrat)

Zippybonzo (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Syunsyunminmin (talk) 17:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

TestWikiUser (Admin)

TestWikiUser (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Farmer Cars (Bureaucrat)

Farmer Cars (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You are already crat and sysop. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 Done I re granted them just to be sure all perms work. Elijah Wilder (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Winfinity (Admin)

Winfinity (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AlPaD (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

SummerShores (Admin)

  • Status:  Done by BrandonWM
  • User: SummerShores ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
  • Requested group/permission: Admin
  • Reason for requesting: I wanted to temporarily create some pages to test wiki functions, but as I understand it I need to delete them afterward, and that ability is reserved for admins.

SummerShores (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Remember to be patient. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. BrandonWM (talk - contribs) 05:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiTester (Admin)

WikiTester (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. AirmanKitten203 (talk) 16:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

2NumForIce (Admin)

2NumForIce (talk) 22:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. Globe (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://publictestwiki.com/wiki/TestWiki:Request_permissions/Archive_13?oldid=50760"