TestWiki:Request permissions: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: just now by DoNotArchiveUntil in topic Example (Example Permission)
Content added Content deleted
(→Waki285 (translation administrators): new section) |
m (fixed) |
||
Line 113:
:{{not done}} Checkuser is not gived to user due to access to private information (+ we can not give this), read the header next time! [[User:HeartsDo|HeartsDo]] ([[User talk:HeartsDo|talk]]) 18:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Eltomas2003}} To add to what {{ping|HeartsDo}} said, if you want to play with the [[mw:Extension:CheckUser|CheckUser]] extension, you can see [https://testwiki.wiki The Test Wiki], which offers the ability to use the tool on only ''yourself''. Hope that helps. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 19:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
== Waki285 (translation administrators) ==
|
Revision as of 01:19, 25 November 2020
Note: Unregistered users cannot be granted permissions. Please log in if you want to request permissions here.
Request permissions on TestWiki Welcome to Miraheze's TestWiki! This page is for requesting testing permissions (Administrator/Bureaucrat) for TestWiki. Tips for a successful request:
Important notes
|
Example (Example Permission)
- Status: Awaiting Reply
- User: Example ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Example Permission
- Reason for requesting: An example reason for the requested right
Example (talk) 00:00, 01 January 1970 (UTC)
Justarandomliberal (Bureaucrat)
- Status: Done by Dmehus
- User: Justarandomliberal ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
- Reason for requesting: I would like to test Bureaucrat tools, and speed up things over at RfP.
Justarandomliberal (talk) 10:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. --Dmehus (talk) 17:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
SCVSlalom (Administrator)
- Status: Done by HeartsDo
- User: SCVSlalom ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Administrator
- Reason for requesting: Just want to try out the tools.
SCVSlalom (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --HeartsDo (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Wgyt (Administrator)
- Status: Done by Naleksuh
- User: Wgyt ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Administrator
- Reason for requesting: This is so I can test wikimedia's admin features to see if it works for my project
Wgyt (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Wgyt: What do you mean by "project"? SCVSlalom (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- By project, I assume he means he plans to create his own wiki. Done either way. Naleksuh (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
DarkMatterMan4500 (Admin)
- Status: Done by HeartsDo
- User: DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Admin
- Reason for requesting: I just want to test out the features, considering how long I've been in this community for months now.
DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --HeartsDo (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Gomezsil (Admin)
- Status: Done by Dmehus
- User: Gomezsil ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Admin
- Reason for requesting: testing
Gomezsil (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Dmehus (talk) 14:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Sabelöga (Translation administrator (if this is separated from regular Administrator that is))
- Status: Done by HeartsDo
- User: Sabelöga ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Translation administrator (if this is seperated from regular Administrator that is)
- Reason for requesting: I wish to test a template that I would then (if it works) implement onto the Meta-Wiki.
Sabelöga (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- As translation administrators tools is included on sysop group, I will give you administrator here for now.
- Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. (PS to @Dmehus: Maybe you can create a translation administrators group here, or is not worth it as administrator is easily obtainable ?) --HeartsDo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- @HeartsDo: Yeah, I remember that @Lois: was interested in doing translations and translation administration here, so I just granted her administrator as everything is included within that toolkit. We could have a translation administrators group, but my only real concern with that is we'd end up with a lot of unnecessary hat collecting. So, I think it's best just to have an administrator group for the time being. What do you think? Dmehus (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also, I saw that the not all the policies are marked for translation,
so I will take care of that, if there's no objection. No wait, I can't edit them. --Sabelöga (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)- @Dmehus: Me too, I am okay to say as administrator group is easily obtainable for omit to create a translation administrator group, I wanted just to be sure to see what is you think about this, so, thanks for have giving your point of view :).
- @Sabelöga: Yeah, most policy pages is protected to bureaucrat level, if you want, I can give you bureacrat group for edit it because I don't see why we should not translate there pages (but if a consul have something to say 👀). HeartsDo (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- @HeartsDo: I'm fine with granting @Sabelöga: bureaucrat sooner than 24 hours, if he requests it in a separate request. As far as preparing those pages for translation, that was on my list of things to do, so I am fine with preparing those pages, and Sabelöga or you are as good as anyone to do it as you both add the Special:MyLanguage and
tvar
tags. Maybe wait a few minutes been preparing the pages, though, as the jobrunner seems to be a bit backlogged in jobs, though. Dmehus (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)- @Dmehus:, @HeartsDo: Alright, request has been sent. --Sabelöga (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- @HeartsDo: I'm fine with granting @Sabelöga: bureaucrat sooner than 24 hours, if he requests it in a separate request. As far as preparing those pages for translation, that was on my list of things to do, so I am fine with preparing those pages, and Sabelöga or you are as good as anyone to do it as you both add the Special:MyLanguage and
- Also, I saw that the not all the policies are marked for translation,
- @HeartsDo: Yeah, I remember that @Lois: was interested in doing translations and translation administration here, so I just granted her administrator as everything is included within that toolkit. We could have a translation administrators group, but my only real concern with that is we'd end up with a lot of unnecessary hat collecting. So, I think it's best just to have an administrator group for the time being. What do you think? Dmehus (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Sabelöga (Bureaucrat)
- Status: Done by HeartsDo
- User: Sabelöga ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
- Reason for requesting: Translation; see discussion above
Sabelöga (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- As Dmehus is okay for grant it before the 24 hour period, I will do it!
- Done. Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. --HeartsDo (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- @HeartsDo: Thanks! I'll do my best and make sure to read through the policies (and translate them ;) before I do anything else. --Sabelöga (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Eltomas2003 (Checkuser)
- Status: Declined by HeartsDo
- User: Eltomas2003 ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Checkuser
- Reason for requesting: Testing tools.
Eltomas2003 (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Checkuser is not gived to user due to access to private information (+ we can not give this), read the header next time! HeartsDo (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Eltomas2003: To add to what @HeartsDo: said, if you want to play with the CheckUser extension, you can see The Test Wiki, which offers the ability to use the tool on only yourself. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)