TestWiki:Request permissions: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: just now by DoNotArchiveUntil in topic Example (Example Permission)
Content deleted Content added
Lava Spire (talk | contribs) |
→Lava Spire (Administrator): re to Lava Spire Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
::I found this through a Google search for "test wikis" because I was wanting to test things admins can do on wikis like protecting pages, translating pages and blocking users. [[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] ([[User talk:Lava Spire|talk]]) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
::I found this through a Google search for "test wikis" because I was wanting to test things admins can do on wikis like protecting pages, translating pages and blocking users. [[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] ([[User talk:Lava Spire|talk]]) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::[[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] Alright. I'm going to grant you <code>[[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> rights ''only'' for now. Should you wish to test <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> rights, you may apply for that and any [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] '''''only''''' may grant that in there discussion. To make granting <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> more likely, please ensure you create, and delete, a sufficient number of test pages with actual text and messages in the body of the pages, reverting your test page creations in the reverse order performed, of course. Alternatively, if you have an existing Wikimedia account in existence for the past several months, please feel free to create a confirmation edit on a Wikimedia wiki stating your account name on Miraheze. Thank you. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
:::[[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] Alright. I'm going to grant you <code>[[TestWiki:Administrators|sysop]]</code> rights ''only'' for now. Should you wish to test <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> rights, you may apply for that and any [[TestWiki:Consuls|Consul]] '''''only''''' may grant that in there discussion. To make granting <code>[[TestWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]]</code> more likely, please ensure you create, and delete, a sufficient number of test pages with actual text and messages in the body of the pages, reverting your test page creations in the reverse order performed, of course. Alternatively, if you have an existing Wikimedia account in existence for the past several months, please feel free to create a confirmation edit on a Wikimedia wiki stating your account name on Miraheze. Thank you. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:All right, will do. Thanks. [[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] ([[User talk:Lava Spire|talk]]) 22:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
::::All right, will do. Thanks. [[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] ([[User talk:Lava Spire|talk]]) 22:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::::[[User:Lava Spire|Lava Spire]] noting [[metawikimedia:Special:CentralAuth/Lava Spire Daredevil Run|this very similarly named Wikimedia account]], have you ever had ''any'' prior Miraheze accounts? I would remind you that you would do well to upfront, honest, and candid. Thanks. [[mh:meta:User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 22:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:41, 18 April 2021
Note: Unregistered users cannot be granted permissions. Please log in if you want to request permissions here.
Request permissions on TestWiki Welcome to Miraheze's TestWiki! This page is for requesting testing permissions (Administrator/Bureaucrat) for TestWiki. Tips for a successful request:
Important notes
|
Example (Example Permission)
- Status: Done by DoNotArchiveUntil
- User: Example ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Example Permission
- Reason for requesting: An example reason for the requested right
Example (talk) 00:00, 01 January 1970 (UTC)
Theory of Eternity (Admin)
- Status: Declined by Dmehus
- User: Theory of Eternity ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Admin
- Reason for requesting: For testing admin powers like protecting and deleting page sand blocking users
Theory of Eternity (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done I'm not satisfied with your apparent confirmation edit on an account created just today and which has zero edits. Moreover, given the outstanding outstanding concerns related to abuse of multiple accounts on Test Wiki, restoration of rights will not be considered at this time. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- When I become an admin here again? Theory of Eternity (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Theory of Eternity, I think it is too early for us to grant the flag. You should follow the advice given by Dmehus and reapply after a while (probably months later). -- Jusl¡t (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- When I become an admin here again? Theory of Eternity (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Joritochip (Administrator)
- Status: Done by Dmehus
- User: Joritochip ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Administrator
- Reason for requesting: I would like to test the Flow extension.
Joritochip (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Please ensure you follow our policies, especially TestWiki:Testing policy and TestWiki:Main policy, reverting every test administrative action in the reverse order performed. As a best practice, test blocks should be done on User:Example or yourself. --Dmehus (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Olipino (Interface Administrator)
- Status: Request Withdrawn by Juslit
- User: Juslit ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Interface Administrator
- Reason for requesting: I'll help to manage system messages.
– Olipino (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- I can’t grant these permissions because bureaucrats can’t grant this, but usually interface administrator permissions are not a test right. Dmehus, renovating, if I'm wrong (thanks)? Currently, this wiki has two interface admins: me and another. I think two is enough interface admin, because at the moment this wiki is also with the technical side all very well. This was not an official decision, but my opinion. Thank you. --Anton (talk) 14:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Olipino There is no specific number of interface administrators, so I would certainly consider granting this user group with a demonstrated need. However, you say your reason is to "help manage system messages." This doesn't need
interface administrator
permissions, as anysysop
with theeditinterface
user right is able to edit MediaWiki system messages in MediaWiki: namespace. Dmehus (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)- Dmehus, please proceed to what you think should be done here. I would like to edit JavaScript or CSS interface files if there is the need. You may be informed that I requested an edit on a js file because I thought there was a need to edit but the conclusion was something different. – Olipino (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. This is a bit better, but can you elaborate on the type of editing you wish to make to existing gadgets, which gadget(s) you wish to focus on, or which gadget(s) you think could be useful for TestWiki? Dmehus (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dmehus, I need to be careful to edit those files because those affect all users rather than only one user (the performer). I will focus on discussion gadgets because they seem to be very useful while discussing something. I'd like to make a gadget similar w:User:Enterprisey/reply-link.js on enwiki. But for editing it, I will (probably) require
interface-admin
bit. – Olipino (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)- That one in particular was the predecessor to the DiscussionTools extension, so may not be needed here. Dmehus (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've enabled the DiscussionTools extension on this page, per your request. Dmehus (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dmehus, thank you for enabling it. What about giving the interface admin bit to my account? -- Jusl¡t (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- That can be done when you elaborate more specifically on your need for the bit, as described here. Dmehus (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dmehus, thank you for enabling it. What about giving the interface admin bit to my account? -- Jusl¡t (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- I've enabled the DiscussionTools extension on this page, per your request. Dmehus (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- That one in particular was the predecessor to the DiscussionTools extension, so may not be needed here. Dmehus (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dmehus, I need to be careful to edit those files because those affect all users rather than only one user (the performer). I will focus on discussion gadgets because they seem to be very useful while discussing something. I'd like to make a gadget similar w:User:Enterprisey/reply-link.js on enwiki. But for editing it, I will (probably) require
- Thank you for your reply. This is a bit better, but can you elaborate on the type of editing you wish to make to existing gadgets, which gadget(s) you wish to focus on, or which gadget(s) you think could be useful for TestWiki? Dmehus (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dmehus, please proceed to what you think should be done here. I would like to edit JavaScript or CSS interface files if there is the need. You may be informed that I requested an edit on a js file because I thought there was a need to edit but the conclusion was something different. – Olipino (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Joritochip (Bureaucrat)
- Status: Done by Juslit
- User: Joritochip ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
- Reason for requesting: Testing nuke extension (I will keep this testing limited to my userspace)
Joritochip (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Olipino (Interface Administrator)
- Status: Declined by Zppix
- User: Juslit ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Interface Administrator
- Reason for requesting: I'm requesting the
editinterface
. I will make a gadget similar to that of w:User:BrandonXLF/Restorer.js on this wiki. I tried to do so before but I don't have the permission to edit sitewide JS files. Futher I will also like to make/adopt useful gadgets from enwiki.
-- Jusl¡t (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Why do we need it? I think you should copy that code first to your own common.js page. There is almost no vandalism on this wiki for which that script is intended. --Anton (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Anton, that script will not only help to revert vandalism. It will restore any version that is archived in the page history. Take the example of your own sandbox/test page (if you have), only you make edits on that page and you cannot use rollback on that page. In that circumstances, this tool will help to restore any version of the page. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I know what is Restorer. I can make Restorer to Gadgets, if you want. But I don't know why. --Anton (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Anton, wait! Don't make. Let me do it if I will be granted the bit. -- Jusl¡t (talk) 07:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I know what is Restorer. I can make Restorer to Gadgets, if you want. But I don't know why. --Anton (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, good luck for requesting! --Anton (talk) 07:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done I am not convinced that the script is needed, or needed sitewide. Therefore no need for the user right to be granted Zppix (Meta | talk to me) 14:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Brewster239 (Bureaucrat)
- Status: Done by Anton
- User: Brewster239 ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Bureaucrat
- Reason for requesting: Testing mass deleting
Brewster239 (T/C) 13:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done Please continue to make sure you are following all policies and know that bureaucrat is, ultimately, a more senior, trusted testing permission. Ultimately, Consuls are the de facto non-test administrators on TestWiki and they, together with the community at TestWiki:Community portal, guide this wiki. If granting permissions, please try and link to the diff page of the given user's request when granting rights, and only grant rights upon request. Anton (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Lava Spire (Administrator)
- Status: Awaiting Reply
- User: Lava Spire ( talk · contribs · deleted · logs · rights · CentralAuth )
- Requested group/permission: Administrator
- Reason for requesting: Testing
Lava Spire (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lava Spire Can you tell me how you found TestWiki, or who referred you to us? Is there any particular aspect you are keen to test? Dmehus (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- I found this through a Google search for "test wikis" because I was wanting to test things admins can do on wikis like protecting pages, translating pages and blocking users. Lava Spire (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lava Spire Alright. I'm going to grant you
sysop
rights only for now. Should you wish to testbureaucrat
rights, you may apply for that and any Consul only may grant that in there discussion. To make grantingbureaucrat
more likely, please ensure you create, and delete, a sufficient number of test pages with actual text and messages in the body of the pages, reverting your test page creations in the reverse order performed, of course. Alternatively, if you have an existing Wikimedia account in existence for the past several months, please feel free to create a confirmation edit on a Wikimedia wiki stating your account name on Miraheze. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 22:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)- All right, will do. Thanks. Lava Spire (talk) 22:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lava Spire noting this very similarly named Wikimedia account, have you ever had any prior Miraheze accounts? I would remind you that you would do well to upfront, honest, and candid. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- All right, will do. Thanks. Lava Spire (talk) 22:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lava Spire Alright. I'm going to grant you
- I found this through a Google search for "test wikis" because I was wanting to test things admins can do on wikis like protecting pages, translating pages and blocking users. Lava Spire (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)